My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Exec Summary_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
Exec Summary_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:32:30 AM
Creation date
1/8/2008 2:54:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Title
Executive Summary
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Executive Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />generally preferred this more strongly than did other <br />interest groups. <br />^ Su~'~ir~~bly M~~t Agri~~lt~ar~l D~~n~r~d~: Also saw <br />a wide range of preferences in each basin. As <br />expected, agricultural interests typically preferred this <br />more strongly than did other interest groups. <br />^~ptimiae Exi~ting and Future W~t~r Supplies: <br />Relatively strong support for this objective was <br />expressed in each basin, with significant variability <br />between interest groups' perspectives from one basin <br />to another. <br />^ Erah~~~e Re~r~~ti~r~~l C~ppor~~n~ti~s: While <br />recognized as important, other water management <br />objectives generally received greater support, even <br />among recreational and environmental interests in <br />most basins. <br />^ Pr~vid~ f~r Errvir~nmental EnMar~c~~nent: A very <br />diverse range of support for this objective was <br />expressed, both within each basin and from basin to <br />basin. Environmental and recreational interests <br />typically ranked this as one of the top objectives <br />relative to the others. <br />^ Pr~r~~~~ ~~~fi-Eff~~ti~e~~~~: Generally saw a <br />moderate to low level of support relative to the other <br />objectives, suggesting that many Basin Roundtable <br />members value other objectives more highly than <br />costs. <br />^ Pr~tect Cultural ~Balue~; This objective saw a <br />moderate to low level of support in most basins, <br />though with wide variability, suggesting an interest in <br />maintaining cultural values but not necessarily at the <br />expense of some of the other objectives. <br />^ Pr~vid~ f~r ~p~r~ti~n~i Fl~xibilit~: This objective <br />was moderately valued in most basins, except in the <br />North Platte Basin, which, on average, valued it less <br />than all of the other objectives. <br />^ Camply with ~fl ,4pplicable Lavus, R~gul~atians, <br />and l~9ater Right~e The Basin Roundtables <br />acknowledged that all alternatives must squarely <br />meet this objective, and rather than serving as a basis <br />of comparison of alternatives, it instead represents a <br />minimum condition or "gate" that all alternatives must <br />successfully pass through to be considered for <br />implementation. <br />Together, these objectives and preferences guided the <br />identification and development of potential solutions to <br />Colorado's future water needs throughout the course of <br />SWSI. <br />Major Findings of SWSI <br />SWSI explored all aspects of Colorado's water use and <br />development on both a statewide and an individual basin <br />basis. As previously mentioned, SWSI focused on <br />in-basin issues first. Analysis of supply and demand at <br />the statewide level will be conducted in greater detail in <br />2005. Major findings identified during this first phase of <br />work are based on technical analyses and feedback <br />gathered through Basin Roundtable input. Even though <br />some of these findings are readily apparent to some, it <br />was important that they be affirmed as part of building a <br />foundation and common understanding. Other findings <br />were determined and/or clarified through the SWSI <br />process. These findings are summarized below. <br />Significant increases in Colorado's population - <br />together with agricultural water needs and an <br />increased focus on recreational and <br />environmental uses - will intensify competition <br />for water. <br />2. Projects and water management planning <br />processes that local M&I providers are <br />implementing or planning to implement have the <br />ability to meet about 80 percent of Colorado's <br />M&I water needs through 2030. <br />To the extent that these identified M&I projects <br />and processes are not successfully <br />implemented, Colorado will see a significantly <br />greater reduction in irrigated agricultural lands <br />as M&I water providers seek additional <br />permanent transfers of agricultural water rights <br />to provide for the demands that would otherwise <br />have been met by specific projects and <br />processes. <br />4. ~upplies are not necessarily where demands <br />are; localized shortages exist, especially in <br />headwater areas, and compact entitlements in <br />some basins are not fully utilized. <br />Increased reliance on nonrenewable, <br />nontributary groundwater for permanent water <br />supply brings serious reliability and <br />sustainability concerns in some areas, <br />particularly along the Front Range. <br />~ <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\EXEC SUMMARY 11-10-04.DOC ES-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.