Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br />E~a~an Raun~t~ble~ - where local interests met to <br />exchange ideas, review and present water supply and <br />demand data, summarize planning initiatives, and help <br />guide the development of water supply and demand <br />objectives and strategies for achieving the objectives. <br />This was a consensus building process to address <br />specific issues within each river basin. A portion of each <br />meeting was also devoted to obtaining information and <br />comment from the public. <br />Roundtable participants in each basin included <br />representatives of: <br />^ Agricultural and ranching community <br />^ Business, development, and civic organizations <br />^ Environmental interests <br />^ Federal agencies (e.g., U.S. Forest Service [USFS], <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation [BOR]) <br />^ Local Governments not directly providing water <br />(municipal, county, and regional) <br />^ Municipal water providers <br />^ Recreational interests <br />^ Water Conservancy/Conservation Districts <br />^ CWCB Board Member(s) for the basin <br />^ Technical support was provided by: the State <br />Engineer's Office (SEO), Division of Wildlife (DOW), <br />State Parks, and select federal agencies <br />~~n~r~l P~bli~ ~utr~~~h - intended to provide a forum <br />specifically for presenting information to and obtaining <br />feedback from the general public. The pubic was kept <br />informed of the progress of the study, and invited to <br />provide public input and feedback, through a variety of <br />activities, including: <br />^ The 2-hour public meeting portion of each of the 30 <br />Basin Roundtable Technical Meetings <br />^ A series of press releases that were issued at key <br />milestones throughout the project <br />^ Presentations to numerous community and <br />stakeholder organizations, including agricultural, <br />environmental, and business groups <br />^ A public comment period specifically reserved for <br />SWSI at each CWCB meeting <br />~~ <br />^ A series of e-mails to a database of over 1,400 <br />Colorado individuals and organizations with an <br />interest in water <br />^ A series of two rounds of Public Information meetings <br />conducted through the course of SWSI <br />^ A project website that was updated throughout the <br />study <br />One of the key goals of the Basin Roundtable and public <br />involvement process was to learn: What is important to <br />people in Colorado when they consider how water should <br />be used and managed? Through the SWSI process, a <br />set of nine major "water management objectives" were <br />developed, refined, and then used to evaluate options for <br />addressing Colorado's future water needs. These <br />objectives represent the overarching interests in water <br />management - they define major goals of water users in <br />clear, understandable terms. <br />Recognizing that each individual will value these <br />objectives in different ways - that is, each individual will <br />assign a unique importance to each objective relative to <br />the others - individual preferences for the objectives <br />were identified and tracked for each Basin Roundtable <br />member in each basin. Similarly, the relative importance <br />of the objectives from one basin to another was different, <br />indicative of the diversity of the basins and the ways <br />water is used in each. <br />Several overall observations can be made from the <br />basin-by-basin assessment of Basin Roundtable <br />members' preferences for the SWSI water management <br />objectives, summarized as follows: <br />^ Sustainably I~~~t Municip~l and Indu~trial (M~I) <br />Demands: A wide range of preferences was evident <br />in each basin. Municipal water interests, as expected, <br />~~ <br />Statew~itle Water Supply Inii'iative <br />ES-6 S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\EXEC SUMMARY 11-10-04.DOC <br />