My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00284
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:39 PM
Creation date
1/8/2008 12:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Thompson, J.R., G.W. Wilderson, and D.A. Griffith, North American Weather Consultants
Sponsor Name
USBR
Title
Cloud Seeding Data Collection, and Analysis Assoc. with the Colo River Augmentation Demonstration Program
Prepared For
USBR, Divison of Atmospheric Research
Prepared By
Thompson, Wilderson, Griffith
Date
12/1/1987
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />I <br />1 <br />l <br />f <br />j <br />I <br />, <br />J <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />to obtain a view of the vertical extent at that downwind distance. <br />Once a level was reached at which the plume could no longer <br />be detected the plane would step outward and conduct another <br />series of transects. <br /> <br />The continuous SF6 analyzer mounted inside ~he aircraft <br />had a response time of approximately .4 second. This extremely <br />fast response time allowed real-time measurement of the tracer <br />gas concentration field from the plane. A pre- and post-flight <br />calibration of the analyzer was performed for each SF6 release. <br />Six calibration gases of known concentrations (10.2, 95, 485, <br />972, 2902 and 4870 parts per trillion from Scott Marrin, Riverside, <br />California) were injected into the inlet port of the analyzer <br />and the analyzer output was recorded. The output was nearly <br />linear over the range of concentrations which were measured <br />during the project. An example of a pre- and post-flight <br />calibration is shown in Figure 4.1. Pre-flight calibrations <br />were done as close to departure time as possible and were <br />nearly always slightly less responsive than post flight calibra- <br />tions. For this reason the two calibrations were incorporated <br />together for data analysis work. This resulted in a better <br />estimate of the response over the entire flight. If most <br />of the plume sampling was done later in the flight then more <br />weight was placed on the post flight calibrations. It should <br />be noted that in a past field project the analyzer output <br />was found to drop by 4/10 of 1% per 100 meter climb in altitude <br />in a pressurized cabin. This occurrence would differ from <br />aircraft to aircraft depending upon a number of factors. <br />Response with altitude was not checked on board the King Air <br />but, 1n general, working altitudes were fairly low so this <br />.factor should not have significantly influenced the output. <br /> <br />4-3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.