My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00284
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:39 PM
Creation date
1/8/2008 12:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Thompson, J.R., G.W. Wilderson, and D.A. Griffith, North American Weather Consultants
Sponsor Name
USBR
Title
Cloud Seeding Data Collection, and Analysis Assoc. with the Colo River Augmentation Demonstration Program
Prepared For
USBR, Divison of Atmospheric Research
Prepared By
Thompson, Wilderson, Griffith
Date
12/1/1987
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />From the precipitation records at the network gauge sites <br />it was evident that a storm almost always consisted of more <br />than one precipitation period (hereafter called a precipitation <br />episode). In fact, as will be shown, it was the norm that <br />several shorter duration precipitation episodes constituted <br />the entire storm. Precipitation periods at each of the seven <br />gauge locations were examined to determine how long a typical <br />precipitation episode might be expected to last. In this <br />context, an episode was defined as follows: An episode began <br />and continued whenever hourly precipitation amounts of any <br />magnitude were recorded, including chart readings at the lowest <br />resolution limit of the gauge. The episode continued as long <br />as the precipitation was continuously detected, with the exception <br />that up to a 2 hour interval without precipitation was allowed. <br />That is, if precipitation resumed after no more than a 2 hour <br />break the episode was considered continuous. This interval <br />was adopted so that a comparison of the episode duration in <br />the Arizona storms could be made with those episodes found <br />in an analysis of Colorado's Grand Mesa storms (Super et. al., <br />1986). They developed this episode definition after a detailed <br />examination of the hourly data from the Grand Mesa precipitation <br />gauges revealed frequent 1 or 2 hour "gaps" in obviously prolonged <br />precipitation periods, as well as frequent readings at the <br />gauge resolution limit within the episodes. Examination of <br />the Arizona data set revealed the same frequent 1 or 2 hour <br />"gaps" in the precipitation patterns as in the Colorado data. <br />At the Arizona gauge sites the threshold of detectability <br />was .005 inch at all but the high resolution Happy Jack gauge <br />where it was .002 inch. <br /> <br />Figure 3.4 plots the cumulative distributions of episode <br />durations for 217 episodes spanning 1466 hours and totaling <br /> <br />3-41 <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />'I <br />I <br />, <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />j <br />I <br />r <br />I <br />'I <br />t <br />t <br />i <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.