Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />j <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />'I <br /> <br />This too, was shifted by about 9 hours from the Arizona data, <br />which peaked about noon. <br /> <br />Based on the limited two month data sample, the diurnal <br />variation of hourly precipitation occurred most frequently <br />during the daytime hours, peaking near noon. In addition, <br />the majority of the total precipitation observed over the <br />period of record also occurred in the daylight hours, primarily <br />between 0900 to 1500 MST. These findings are in contrast <br />to a similar analysis of diurnal precipitation variation on <br />the Grand Mesa in Colorado, where both the maximum frequency <br />of occurrence and maximum percentage of total precipitation <br />occurred at night. Clearly, more data needs to be acquired <br />in regard to the Arizona precipitation regime before any firm <br />conclusions in regard to the diurnal variation can be reached. <br /> <br />3.2.7 <br /> <br />Precipitation Periods Within a storm (Episodes) <br /> <br />The presence of precipitation over the region is not <br />a guarantee that sufficient SLW is available for cloud seeding <br />to be effective, e.g., see episodes SS-9 and SS-10. But, <br />the fact that some precipitation is falling indicates the <br />presence of clouds and the analysis in Section 3.1 documents <br />that there were many instances when precipitation was falling <br />and considerable SLW was also present which might suggest <br />that some augmentation potential was present. At any rate, <br />the duration of precipitation can be of considerable importance <br />in planning future weather modification experiments or operational <br />programs. <br /> <br />3-40 <br />