Laserfiche WebLink
<br />San Juan/Dolores/San Miguel Basin Roundtable Technical Meeting #3 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />projects and processes) as well as knowledge of existing supplies and water rights where <br />applied to this initial gap estimate. He then described how mid-term and long-term projects <br />would be considered to meet the remaining gap. Kelly discussed that supply availability at a <br />basin level would be used as a "check" for meeting the remaining demands. <br /> <br />Feedback from the BRT members on the preliminary gap analysis is summarized below. <br />References such as "item D13" refer to the identification number of certain options from the list <br />of options handed out at the meeting. <br /> <br />Demands/Gap <br /> <br />. There are some domestic augmentation plans in the basin but most don't have much lawn <br />irrigation; this might bring consumptive use numbers lower than 35%. It was noted that the <br />consumptive use number is not that critical in the San Juan/Dolores/San Miguel Basin. <br />. It was clarified that well users' "passive" conservation rates were assumed to be the same as <br />all others. <br />. Seasonal demand fluctuations are not well documented; the group confirmed that assuming <br />that the tourism growth rate will be equal to population growth rate is okay. <br />. It was assumed that there is a 5 to 10% gap for rural areas in most counties where there is <br />limited groundwater. <br />. One participant observed that in Southwest La Plata County, the limitation of groundwater <br />supply doesn't seem to stop or limit growth. <br />. Many rural domestic water users have opted to haul water; this may continue in the future <br />on the "fringes" of development. Many of these users will eventually construct a centralized <br />water system, so the amount hauled may stay relatively constant over time. <br />. We should consider the implications of areas that may in the future become water critical <br />areas. <br />. There's a difference between holding a water right and having a viable water project - many <br />implementation issues govern a project's true viability. <br />. We may need to consider the total supply available to a county beyond 2030. <br /> <br />Identified Projects and Processes <br /> <br />. The Dolores River Dialogue is an ongoing process. <br />. CWCB acquisition of interest in Dolores Project releases: there is an ongoing discussion; this <br />option should be merged with the Dolores River Dialogue. <br />. Water for Everyone Tomorrow Package (WETPACK) Cloud Seeding: this process is in place <br />basin-wide on an ad-hoc basis. WETP ACK cloud seeding is a subset of this. Cloud seeding is <br />ongoing but not guaranteed to continue into the future. <br />. Western La Plata County Water Management and Conservation Plan: only some of the <br />components are ongoing. Some such as ditch lining are not currently being implemented. <br />. Conservation/ efficiency options can affect return flows. <br />. Western La Plata County Domestic Water System will only cover about 60% of the area; the <br />exact percent is unclear. The remainder will stay on groundwater. <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />SJD BRT Mtg #3 Summary_Final 7-9-04.doc 7/9/2004 <br />