Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Yampa/White/Green Basin Roundtable Technical Meeting #2 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br /> <br />Technical Advisors <br />David H. Smith <br />John Fetcher <br />David Graf <br />Bob Plaska <br />Chas Cartwright <br />Melissa Trammell (for <br />Chas Cartwright) <br />1 Substitute attended <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Division of Wildlife <br />Division Engineer <br />Dinosaur National Monument <br />Dinosaur National Monument <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Basin Advisor <br />State Agencies <br />State Agencies <br />Federal Agencies <br />Federal Agencies <br /> <br />x <br />X <br /> <br />X <br />X1 <br />X <br /> <br />Sue Morea reviewed the agenda for the meeting. The agenda included: <br /> <br />. A review of the SWSI process and status <br />. Revised water management objectives and subobjectives and the objective "weighting" <br />process <br />. Preliminary results of population estimates and water demands for the <br />Yampa/White/Green basin <br />. Preliminary list of water management "options" and "tiering" <br />. Overview of draft water supply methodology <br />. Anticipated activities and input requested from BRT members between now and BRT3 <br />. Public comment <br /> <br />Copies of the presentation materials were distributed to BRT members. Comments and <br />questions received throughout the meeting were recorded on flip charts and are included in the <br />meeting notes below. The summary is not intended to be a verbatim account and answers to the <br />questions are not always summarized here. The purpose of the summary is to provide an <br />overview of the process and the general tenure of the meeting. <br /> <br />SWSI Process <br /> <br />Rick Brown reviewed the overall SWSI project schedule, progress to date, and described the <br />goals of this second BRT meeting. Rick noted that a few BRT members (in this basin and other <br />basins) had requested that they be able to see other BRT members' comments on materials such <br />as the objectives, demand methodology, etc. Rick acknowledged the value of this in a <br />transparent process and stated that he is investigating ways of making BRT members' <br />comments available electronically, possibly via the CWCB website. Larger reports referenced in <br />comments might not be reproduced or scanned. <br /> <br />Water Management Objectives <br /> <br />Rick Brown presented the revised list of water management objectives and subobjectives, based <br />on comments and feedback obtained from the first round of BRT meetings around the state and <br />from the CWCB Board meeting in November 2003. Sue explained how the original list of <br />objectives was modified based on this input. The SWSI team found through this process that <br />there was significant consistency from basin to basin in the types of objectives identified, <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />YWG BRT Mtg #2 Summary.doc 4/16/2004 <br />