My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11215
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:17 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:56:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 06/17/2007
Date
6/17/2007
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />discussed whether Senator Allard could be helpful in contacting the Office of <br />Management and Budget (OMB) and if a face-to-face meeting could be arranged with <br />OMB. Sean Conway and Mandi McKinley agreed to look into this matter and suggested <br />that a meeting with OMB in August may be necessary to make our case before the <br />agency because of the schedule they are operating under. <br /> <br />Follow-on list: <br />. Does Omaha District have approval by the O&M managers at HQfor FY08 funds <br />for the Seismic Stability Report? How much? <br />. Couldfunds be reprogrammed to 2007 to speed the study? <br />. Can Chatfield move ahead of Cherry Creek on urgency justification? <br />. Does the Corps have a "go by" showing us a successful way to present our <br />results? Develop a ROD for a reallocation project? Develop water contracts and <br />project cooperation agreements? <br />. Is there a precedent for allowing storage to occur prior to completion of <br />mitigation activities? (Phased investment?) <br />. Sample contact with exhibits? <br />. Can we look at Prado Dam project in California as an example of money flow for <br />mitigation(since cash flow terms in the contract need to be identified to the <br />CWCB and local water users as soon as is reasonable)? <br />. Where do we find the documents? <br />. How do we obtain a "best estimate of costs" in time for legislation? <br /> <br />June 20 Emailfrom John Micik, USACE HQ in response to June 18 Washington, DC <br />meeting. <br />David: <br /> <br />Attached are examples of a water storage agreement (Word) and a ROD (Acrobat), <br />although the ROD is not for a water storage reallocation. I'm still trying to track one <br />down. It seems that for most of our reallocation actions, an environmental assessment <br />is adequate to meet NEP A requirements. <br />Also, below are two links that you may find useful. Please keep in mind, however, that <br />Department of the Army water storage agreements are drafted not only to reflect <br />Federal laws that govern water supply storage in general, but also laws that apply to <br />specific projects and decisions made by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil <br />Works) under his discretionary authority. <br /> <br />It was a pleasure meeting with you and the others on Monday. I look forward to the <br />next meeting. <br /> <br />Regards, <br />John Micik <br />Office of Water Project Review <br />(202) 761-8643 <br /> <br />Kansas City Levees EIS Page <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.