FLOOD11215 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The coalition then proceeded to characterize current water short falls that exist on a local level. Jim Reasoner noted that a lot of water will need to come out of the South Platte River north of the Denver metropolitan area to meet agricultural needs augmenting existing groundwater supplies. In the South Metro area, there are serious shortcomings related to utilization of groundwater since it is a non-renewable supply. Continued growth will create pressure that groundwater sources will be unable to meet. Chatfield Reallocation would help alleviate this situation by improving the yield of renewable surface water supplies. Tracy Bouvette noted that, generally speaking, the South Platte River Basin is "over-appropriated". John Hendrick commented on the reliability of reservoir storage. He noted that Centennial Water and Sanitation District would have received a 6500 AF firm yield if Two Forks had been built. Anytime Centennial can pull water off Chatfield, it helps prolong the District's deep well sources. If Chatfield Reallocation had been previously approved and available for use, Centennial could have stored water this year as a result of excess snowmelt runoff and rainfall runoff. Tracy Bouvette commented that without a Record of Decision (ROD), Colorado can't realistically include Chatfield Reallocation for water supply planning purposes. John Micik asked what the Omaha District has said regarding the completion of the FR/EIS. Tom Browning noted that the current schedule calls for the ROD to be rendered by spring/summer 2009. In terms of meeting the schedule as articulated above, Tom Browning raised concerns about the Seismic Stability Report (SSR) that must be conducted on the Chatfield Dam. The Phase 1 SSR Study is scheduled to be funded through FY08 Corps O&M (or possibly construction general) dollars. The concern is that if the study is not completed by the time the ROD is issued, the Corps would instead issue a conditional ROD. A conditional ROD could delay the reallocation process and detrimentally impact local water supply planning efforts. Tom Browning asked whether there was anything HQ could do to move up the study in order to complete it before the ROD is rendered. John Micik commented that Phase 1 cost would be as high as $150,000. Tracy Bouvette said it was his understanding that Phase 1 could cost anywhere from $40,000 to $150,000. John Micik said that the Corps has indicated that the O&M account is flexible from a reprogramming point of view. He offered to check with the Omaha District to see if they've spoken with HQ about reprogramming O&M dollars to fund the study. Ken Hall noted that the Chatfield FR/EIS is not in the President's FY08 budget. John Micik said that the Omaha District's request to reprogram funds for the study is tied to completing the ROD in a timely fashion and would be a sound justification. Tracy Bouvette walked through the schedule as it is known currently for development of the FR/EIS and ROD. Tom Browning commented that this could potentially become a major problem for the reallocation to stay on schedule if the SSR Study is delayed. Concerns were expressed also about the potential costs of the study as well as whether the Corps has the funds available to undertake the study and keep it on schedule. The Chatfield group underscored the importance of keeping the SSR on schedule consistent with the 2