My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11205
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:16 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:51:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 11/13/2007
Date
11/13/2007
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6. Flood Damages-Complete <br />7. Water Quality-Complete <br />8. Cost of Reallocation-In progress <br />9. Reservoir Modeling (Hydrology)-Complete <br />10. South Platte Modeling (Hydraulics)-Complete <br />11. Environmental Mitigation Plan-In progress <br />12. Water Control Plan-Complete <br />13. Dam Safety-Complete <br />14. Environmental Restoration-Gary received a copy this <br />morning and will be able to include it in the Preliminary Draft. <br />15. Parks/EDAW Report-Report is complete; EDAW is working <br />on reformatting to an 8.5x11 format for the FR-EIS. <br />. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report will go in the draft but not <br />the Preliminary Draft. The Biological Assessment will be in the final only- <br />not in the Preliminary Draft or Draft. This is because Fish and Wildlife only <br />wanted to comment on the "preferred alternative" and that decision only <br />comes after the Draft is released. The Coordination Act Report, Biological <br />Assessment and Biological Opinion have to be finalized before the ROD. <br />. Question from Rick: When is the preferred alternative decided? Eric said <br />the COE determines but it won't be decided until it goes to the public. <br />. The COE plans to give Tetra Tech a reviewed version of Chapter 2 by the <br />end of the week. <br />. Chapters 1, 3, 4, and 6 are ready to be included in the Preliminary Draft <br />(some holes are still being filled). Chapters 5, 7, and 8 cannot be finalized <br />until after the public comment period. <br />. Question from Rick: When can you give the Cooperators a copy of the <br />Preliminary Draft? Eric is getting a CD copy today to begin his review and <br />he doesn't want to put a date on when it will go out to the cooperators. <br /> <br />3) Water Quality Modeling <br />. Gene Weglinski (Tetra Tech) said that the water quality numbers have <br />been revised based on the COE revised hydrology model. With the new <br />model residence times increased (the pool lasted longer) but there was <br />not a significant change in overall water quality. <br />. Bacterial loading didn't change. There was a slight increase from the <br />previous version in phosphorus and nutrient amounts and a slight <br />decrease in metals. <br />. The water quality impact assessment (for Chapter 4) is in progress-the <br />new model results will be compared with water quality standards. <br />. Katie Fendel (Leonard Rice Engineers/City of Brighton) wanted to know if <br />mitigation will need to begin based on the new water quality numbers. <br />Rick reiterated that the Water Quality Working Group is waiting anxiously <br />for this data because they anticipate environmental impacts and they want <br />to talk about them soon. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Tetra Tech <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.