Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ken: I've got some questions, what is in the SOW for TT, writing the EIS? They are a <br />contractor for the Corps, SOW, these are the meat and potatoes of these things, things we've <br />been asked to bring to the table, should be in the SOW in an EIS. I am somewhat surprised. <br /> <br />Rick: Tom, have you it? <br /> <br />Tom: I haven't. <br /> <br />Ken: People in this room have good points, very valid, but from Parks' point of view, we're <br />expected to come up with relocation plan, where the key high water lines are. I'm surprised we <br />started to discuss socio-economic impacts on recreation, that should be in the SOW for the <br />contractor, and we just started that. Perhaps waiting to know high water line, TT doesn't agree <br />on where it is, we need to work this out. Some differences, could effect acreage of <br />environmental mitigation. <br /> <br />Karen: What is the disagreement? <br /> <br />Ken: EDA We?) feels more areas will be inundated. Some areas that are different that the lines <br />on the map TT provided, such as on Deer Creek, showing it will be inundated, TT doesn't show <br />that. Different datums being used. 1929 EDA W v 1983 TT. <br /> <br />Bill: Verticals and horizontal data mixed up. <br /> <br />Mary: We're in the process of changing data to 1929, going to resolve this. <br /> <br />Ken: This is a category of surprise, didn't hear about this. <br /> <br />Bill: This raises by 3 feet. <br /> <br />Tom: It will be one of the discussion topics tomorrow, it's a surprise, it's a problem, <br /> <br />Ken: Did some truth checking on photos. Led to fairly recently, sort of came upon this. It's <br />good we know. <br /> <br />Kent: Larry Lang also did this same study years ago. <br /> <br />Anne: He came up a long time ago. <br /> <br />Ken: No impact on main beach restrooms, but if you do the 1929 data, it's 4 foot of water <br />different. That's where this all came about. EDA W did the same thing, started with 1989 data, <br />there's no impact, then 1929 data shows 4 foot of water rather than none, so they corrected their <br />mistake So it has a great deal of difference of what vegetation will be inundated. <br /> <br />Tom: I believe the modeling Joel did based on 1929 data. The 5444 elevation, that's 1929 data. <br />That is the datum Joel used, if you overlay that on a map, the map is a 1988 topo map, it won't <br />match. We need one standard. <br /> <br />5 <br />