Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jeff: You can put this before the Corps, make the request, they can decide if this is something <br />they are willing to do. <br /> <br />Sandy: I don't think populating this is would be a problem. <br /> <br />Kent: (?) So he may already have this already. <br /> <br />Rick: Yes, this is just mine... <br /> <br />Kent: This is part of Eric's task, it's not an additional task... <br /> <br />Sandy - since during the 1 st quarter will be in a funding resolution process... <br /> <br />McAuliffe: We will have a spreadsheet that shows us a train wreck is coming, but it comes <br />down to the 50/50 cost share... we have the info and hopefully it will be useful to us. <br /> <br />Rick: This should be agenda 1 item on the monthly funding meeting., and we spend 5 minutes <br />on it. That's my goal here, so we are no longer in the dark about the funding part. <br /> <br />McAuliffe - DC Trip, Kirk Russell's part I can cover. <br /> <br />Rick: I would like you to talk about what you see, what are you working on, what did we learn <br />from Washington. . . two key contracts. . . and you are on the hunt. <br /> <br />McAuliffe: Want to go there now? I will start with DC trip before I leave. Corps headquarters <br />meeting, very helpful, nodding heads, key contracting issues, scheduling issues and things we <br />focused on their next do-ups. Agreements between us and the Corps, focused on two recent <br />projects that would be good models for us, Project for city of Tacoma, another recreational <br />project in Texas. Both results of statutes thought to be generic enough, they would serve as <br />models. Said they though all of this could be done, rather than in several agreements, one <br />integrated agreement. Storage, recreation and mitigation agreement all in one. Corps promised <br />to get us copies of this. Office of Management and budget meeting, set up that the president <br />dropped it, delegation should include adequate funding, its $400,000, there was $273K in the <br />Senate bill, go ahead with Senate bill, Congress may not actually pass it, president may veto it, <br />continuing resolution, outlooks are good, continuing resolution might include at least $200K if <br />not the whole item. The other discussion with Corps seismic studies and dam safety, part of the <br />ongoing part of Corps review, problem is if state enters into contract after the ROD, Chatfield is <br />low priority, and if there is a safety problem, we foot the bill. Need higher priority. Trying to <br />make that happen next year, got good feedback from Corps officials that it would be a big <br />mistake if something bad happened. Corps people came to internal decision rather than paying <br />100% for cost of future storage, realized Chatfield wouldn't fill each year, inequitable to charge <br />for 5 years out of 5 years, something balanced on actually filling, formula that they promised to <br />send us info on, but it would save money. Didn't have to argue, they were already there. <br /> <br />This document represents the personal staff notes of Susan Maul and are not to be considered a formal record of <br />this meeting. <br /> <br />8 <br />