Laserfiche WebLink
<br />· Birds: 437 to 445 vs. 453 <br />· Preble's: 299 to 305 vs. 332 <br />· Wetlands: 220 to 228 vs. 114 <br />· It is important to note that these acreage estimates do not <br />yet account for overlap of habitats or mitigation ratios. <br />o The next steps for the mitigation table include: <br />· Developing necessary information in order to assess the <br />feasibility of the candidate site. The workgroup will need <br />help with information on water sources, water availability, <br />and cost. <br />· The workgroup will identify feasible sites and move them <br />forward in the Conceptual Mitigation Plan. <br />· They will assess the habitat overlap and determine the <br />mitigation ratios with the USFWS. <br />. Rod Kuharich noted that possible mitigated habitat lands could come from <br />open space in future developments in Highlands Ranch and Littleton- <br />they would be mostly drainage ways. He added that another source of <br />land could be in the unincorporated areas surrounding the cities that are <br />managed by home owners' associations. They have to maintain a <br />designated amount of open space. <br />. Tom Browning said the State of Colorado maintains a right-of-way on the <br />South Platte River downstream of Chatfield Reservoir for 6 miles (250 feet <br />on each bank)-this land could potentially be offered for mitigation. He <br />added that the State needs to find the best cost/benefit ratio. <br />. Participant question: will the mitigated lands be included in the final EIS? <br />Dan McAuliffe said that the agreements will not necessarily be in the final <br />but wants to have the plans in place before the final draft is issued <br />because the State will need to know how much the agreements will cost. <br />. It was suggested by Tom Browning that the next Mitigation subcommittee <br />meeting should before the Environmental and Recreation subcommittee <br />meeting on August 21 st. <br />. Coordination of recreation and environmental mitigation Following a <br />conference call between Tetra Tech, the Corps, and Parks, on July 1 ih <br />Tetra Tech provided the Parks with habitat maps in GIS for use by EDAW. <br />Tetra Tech is currently analyzing the impacts to trees and vegetation and <br />will provide this information to the Parks. There needs to be ongoing <br />communication between Parks, EDAW and the Corps, and Tetra Tech <br />regarding these subjects. <br />. Corps' Investigation of Berms and Embankments Power Point slides <br />presented by Betty Peake and Eric Laux outline the amount of ponded <br />acres created by various scenarios on Plum Creek and the South Platte <br />River. <br />o Plum Creek <br />· A single 66-foot high embankment placed near the 5,444' <br />contour creates a ponded area of 630 acres. This is a highly <br />unrealistic option. <br /> <br />2 <br />