My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11196
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:16 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:47:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 06/22/2006
Date
6/22/2006
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />DcnveL Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX (303) 866-4474 <br />www.cwcb.stateco.us <br /> <br /> <br />Bil1 Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />MEIVIORANDUM <br /> <br />Ru ssell George <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />RE: <br /> <br />Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Study Group <br />Tom Browning, Chief, Flood Protection Section <br />July 27,2006 <br />Chatfield Meeting Summary for June 22, 2006 <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWeB Director <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />Washington DC Meetings and update (Tom Browning) <br />· Recently met senators on Capitol Hill to gain support for continued funding for project. <br />o Feel that we have congress' attention.. . optimistic about funding support from Congress for <br />FY07 and FY08 to finish study. <br />o While Scn Allard began the meeting in an upset mood due to a misunderstanding, he began <br />to wann up to the project. According to him, it appears to be a medium priority, as he has <br />another project which he would like to ensure gets funding. <br />o Both Senators wrote in $500k within the 07 budget Senate markup for Reallocation Study. <br />o There appears to be no support on the house side. <br />· Met with OMB representative (Jim Mietus) for 2 hrs. He appears to be an advocate for the <br />project. <br />o According to Jim, "environmental infrastructure" is the new buzzword for water supply. <br />Word use is very critical to gaining support for a project such as this, as water supply <br />projects lose favor in the president budget. Thus, when discussing with higher ups, need to <br />be strategic with word usc. <br />o With this knowledge, we should make OMB aware ofCOE policy (Corps Strategic Plan, <br />Environmental Operating Principles, Env. Restoration, etc). Need to be creative in using <br />appropriate language from these policies and stress multipurpose concept, that is, water for <br />traditional as well as environmental purposes. <br />o It sounds like we are going to be in a long lasting CRA (continuing resolution authority) <br />next year. <br />. 06 funding <br />o Fed dollars are cunently nearly gone. COE to send letter to ewes to request sponsor <br />money in order to continue study at current ratc. <br />o Corps is working to extend Tetra Tech's Contract <br />· WRDA It appears that WRDA has some life in the cunent session, and has a good chance of <br />passmg. <br />o Marty thought that current version (joint version) lost the "ecosystem restoration" wording <br />that we pushed to get put into law. This means that we will need to work on stretching the <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Plannmg and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.