Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 4 - <br /> <br />Recreation Imoact Phase II Studv (Parks) <br />. Paul Flack is gone and will be back in April but he has access to state email and is working with the <br />EDA W Phase II Recreation study. EDA W has met with Parks a couple of times; the next meeting will <br />be in early February. Brad Buckner is the Parks contact and Parks will have more to report after the <br />February meeting. Some omissions in the site-specific facility inventory in the EDA W study need to be <br />rectified. <br /> <br />Chatfield Reallocation Costs oer Acre Foot <br />. Joe Busto provided some information for the Water Users. The Feasibility Report/Environmental <br />Impact Statement (FRlEIS) is now being financed from money ($491K) that was collected in 2005 for <br />non-federal share of the completion of Chatfield Reallocation Study. Completion of the Chatfield Study <br />includes a Corps Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement that are integrated into one <br />report per new guidance. The short answer is that we (the Corps + the Sweet 16 + the CWCB) are <br />financing the FRlEIS. There may be additional funding needed before we are done. <br />. The current cost estimate for storage space when and if the reallocation process is calculated to be <br />about $5,000/AF, but there are some additional details that need to be worked out before a firm number <br />is available. The Corps cost categories that comprise the calculation are: Reallocation of Storage Space <br />(Corps formula for calculation of investment into Chatfield) + Recreation Mitigation (Phase I State <br />Parks Recreation Study showed $30 million to move facilities up and above 5444) + Environmental <br />Mitigation (currently unknown dollar amount) + other mitigation costs (i.e. downstream flooding also <br />currently unknown). <br />. The Corps' investment cost ($41 M) and the State Parks cost for mitigation of impacts to facilities <br />($30M) are fairly firm numbers. So technically using only these two known numbers we have <br />$71,610,000 in costs if divided for 20,600 AF = $3,476/AF. But we know that number will be higher <br />based on the other amounts that are still unknown. <br />. The CWCB and the Corps will produce a table and graph of the current estimate at a future meeting, <br />but we are cautioned the final answer is still unknown. <br /> <br />Next Meetin2: Date <br />. March 2nd, 2006, 10:00AM - 12:00 PM, Tech Tech offices, 143 Union Blvd (loth floor), Lakewood, <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />Flood Protection . Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />