Laserfiche WebLink
iii. Concern with continued expansion of existing transbasin developments. <br />f. Summit County concerns -Blue River: <br />i. Dillon Reservoir and Roberts Tunnel System. <br />ii. Conflicts with Resort area M&I demands <br />Dillon Reservoir level <br />Stream flow needs <br />iii. Concern with expanding Dillon Reservoir. <br />g. Garfield County -Middle Colorado River <br />i. Continued M&I development along Glenwood to Grand Junction corridor will require <br />additional direct diversions from the Colorado River. <br />1. Rifle is expected to grow from 8,000 to 40,000 people due to energy development. <br />ii. Concerned with Shoshone Power call and its effects on rafting and kayaking. <br />iii. Concerned with poorer water quality due to high salt loads from saline springs. <br />h. Eagle County -Eagle River <br />i. In basin development and conversion from agricultural to non-agricultural uses reduces <br />in-stream flow in late season. <br />ii. Concerned with potential future transbasin diversions. <br />i. Mesa County -Lower Colorado River <br />i. Agriculture uses depend on good quality spring and summer flows. <br />ii. Concerned with being "at the bottom of the ditch." <br />iii. Concerned with long term implications of Colorado River usage and basin compact call. <br />j. IPPs in NEPAs potentially impacting the Colorado River Basin <br />i. Moffatt firming (Denver Water) <br />ii. Windy Gap firming (Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and others). <br />iii. NISP (Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and others). <br />k. The Way Ahead <br />i. Address shortages in the headwaters area. The Vail ditch would restore a few hundred <br />acre feet to the River Fraser drainage, and this would be a major enhancement. <br />ii. Impacts of transbasin firming projects. <br />iii. Compact delivery impacts to existing and fiiture in-basin water rights. <br />I:AInterbasin Compact Cominittee~Basin Roundtables\Colorado~Minutes~Ivlumtes Oct 2007 CBRT (2).doc 3 I2~_ <br />