Laserfiche WebLink
vi. John Redifer noted that the study has to be done, and whether the information is used in <br />a lawsuit is beside the point. <br />b. Roaring Fork Water Shed Study Phase II. $40,000 from Basin Account <br />Phase 1, which created the State of the Roaring Fork Watershed Report, and which <br />received $40,000 from the Basin Account, is nearly complete. <br />ii. Phase 2 is designed to generate a plan to convene stakeholders, prioritize conservation <br />and water development projects, recommend legislative and regulatory actions to local <br />governments, and identify gaps requiring further study. <br />iii. The Phase 2 budget is $101,000, and the Roaring Fork Watershed Study Group is <br />requesting $40,000. Other fenders include local towns and county governments, <br />Gunnison County, the Colorado River Conservation District, and the Roaring Fork <br />Conservancy, which is also the primary contractor developing the study <br />c. Old Dillon Reservoir Enlargement: $100,000 from the Basin Account. <br />Dan Burroughs, the Dillon Town Engineer, presented a proposal for $100,000 to pay <br />for engineering and environmental assessment studies to enlarge Old Dillon Reservoir <br />from its existing 46 AF capacity to 250-280 AF. Old Dillon Reservoir sits between <br />Interstate 70 and Dillon Reservoir just before I-70 drops down to Silverthorne and <br />crosses the Blue River outflow from Dillon Reservoir. The towns of Dillon and <br />Silverthorne and Summit County support the project; for convenience, they are <br />referenced together as Dillon below. <br />ii. The reservoir enlargement is expected to cost $7-8 million, and Dillon plans to request <br />construction funding from the CWCB Constn~ction Fund to pay for the project. Dillon <br />has already spent $190,000 on a feasibility analysis. Dillon hopes to have approval for <br />the project by September 2008, perform engineering work in the winter of 2008-09, and <br />begin constn~ction in May 2009. <br />iii. This amounts to a cost of $40,000 per acre foot of new water. Water in Clinton <br />Reservoir (4,372 AF capacity) now sells for $30,000 per acre foot; this reservoir is one <br />of Summit County's main water sources, and it sits southwest of Hoosier Pass. <br />Dillon's only existing water rights are to 20 acre feet in Clinton Gulch Reservoir and to <br />36 AF in Old Dillon Reservoir. <br />iv. Dillon, Silverthorne and Sununit County now have decreed rights for 281 AF, and this <br />dam will firm up those rights. Taylor Hawes commented that both the UPCO and <br />SWSI studies identified needs for Dillon, and stated that enlarging Old Dillon Reservoir <br />will help meet those needs. Carlyle Currier questioned whether Dillon's rights were <br />too junior to fill the enlarged reservoir, and Dan Burroughs replied that Salt Lick Gulch <br />it averages 1,200 AF and, in the low water year of 2002, it generated 400 AF. <br />v. Greg Trainor asked whether Dillon could obtain water from Green Mountain Reservoir <br />for less than $40,000 per acre. Dan Burroughs stated that there's currently a <br />moratorium on Green Mountain Reservoir supply contracts, and that it's hard to deal <br />with large entities such as Denver Water (which owns the water in Dillon Reservoir) <br />and the BLM which manages Green Mountain Reservoir. Tom Long, Summit County <br />I:AInterbasin Compact Coimnittee~Basin Roundtables\Colorado~Minutes~Ivlumtes Nov 2007 CBKT.doc 4 l2~- <br />