My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
10 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:33:53 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 10:24:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
ISF Section - Uncontested 2007 Instream Flow Appropriations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
For this segment of stream, 2 data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br />Table 1: Data <br />Part Date Q 250%-40% Summer (3/3) Winter (2/3) <br />BLM 10/7/2005 3.88 9.7 1.6 4.2 NA <br />BLM 8/19/2004 4.89 12.2 2.0 8.4 NA <br />BLl\I = Bm'eau of Land Management DOW = Di~~ision of Wildlife <br />Biolo:;ic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model is 6.25 cfs (See Table 1). This recommendation was derived by <br />averaging the results of the two data sets. It is our belief that recommendations that fall outside <br />of the accuracy range of the model, over 250% of the measured discharge or under 40% of the <br />measured discharge may not give an accurate estimate of the necessary instream flow required. <br />Hydrologic Data <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br />instream flow appropriation. The hydrograph below was derived from data collected by the <br />USGS stream gage for Cochetopa Creek Below Rock Creek Near Parlin, CO (ID #09118450), <br />which has a drainage area of 334 square miles (See Gage Summary in Appendix C). The total <br />drainage area of the Pauline Creek drainage is approximately 42 square miles. The period of <br />record for this gage was 1981-2005, the period of record used by staff in their analysis was 1981- <br />2005, or 25 years of record. To provide for a more accurate estimate of the stream flows on <br />Pauline Creek, the mean monthly consumptive use associated with upstream diversions was <br />added to the mean monthly stream flows. The consumptive use was assumed to be 50% of the <br />diversion amount. In addition, a senior ti-ansbasin diversion (Cochetopa Meadows Ditch) is <br />located above the proposed instream flow water right. The mean monthly diversion amounts <br />were subtracted from the estimated flows on Pauline Creek. <br />Table 2 and Figure 1 show that the summer flow recommendation of 6.25 cfs (2.75 cfs <br />enlargement) is available on average for the time period of May 1 through June 30. The summer <br />flow recommendation was reduced to 5 cfs (2.0 cfs enlargement) for the time periods of April 1 <br />to April 30 and July 1 to August 31, based on limited water availability. The summer flow <br />recommendation was reduced further to 4.5 cfs (1.0 cfs enlargement) for the time period of <br />September 1 to September 30, based on limited water availability. <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.