My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
10 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:33:53 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 10:24:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2007
Description
ISF Section - Uncontested 2007 Instream Flow Appropriations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Instream Flow Recommendation(s) <br />BLM recommended an enlargement of 2.75 cfs during the summer, based on its October 7, 2005 <br />and August 19, 2004 data collection efforts (see Appendix A). The modeling results from this <br />survey effort are within the confidence interval produced by the R2Cross model. <br />Land Status Review <br /> Total Length Land Ownership <br />Upper Terminus Lower Terminus (miles) % Private % Public <br /> Confluence with <br />Confluence with <br /> Tarbell & 4 <br />1 23 % 77 <br />Chavez Creek . <br /> Alexander Ditch <br />The 77% of public lands in this reach is comprised of 37% USFS lands and 40%BLM lands. <br />Biological Data <br />The BLM has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources in this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported in the letter from BLM to the CWCB <br />"Pauline Creek is a moderate gradient stream with large substrate and good vegetative cover. <br />Fishery surveys indicate that the creek supports aself-sustaining brook trout, rainbow trout, <br />brown trout, and white sucker fishery. The stream environment is presently in good condition <br />and provides suitable substrate, channel stability, water quality, and food supplies for salmonids. <br />However, the stream has a high number of pools and beaver ponds, so spawning locations are <br />limited. Accordingly, it is important to provide stream flows to maintain the limited amount of <br />spawning habitat and to maintain water exchange in pools during low flow periods." (See Fish <br />Survey in Appendix B). <br />Field Survey Data <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of field <br />data collected for this proposed segment. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that by maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and suns will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.