Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I'JOlTE <br /> <br />BEYOND ENGINEERING <br /> <br />City of Brush <br />Storm Drainage Master Plan <br /> <br />Alternative 2 (also shown as Alternative 2 in the previous Carter Burgess study) consists <br />of construction of street grading and other improvements from Alternative 1, but instead <br />to flowing to a proposed retention pond, the runoff is conveyed via large diameter storm <br />sewer to the city's existing main retention pond north of 1-76. Total costs for this <br />alternative are approximately $3.4 million and $3.6 million for the 10-year and 25-year <br />design options respectively. A 100-year option was not evaluated for this alternative <br />since it discharges to the city's main detention facility, which is assumed to be adequate <br />for large storm events. This assumption should be verified during final design. <br /> <br />Alternative 3 consists of similar street and storm sewer improvements but utilizes <br />detention storage near the existing Central School and Middle School sites. Total <br />estimated costs for this alternative are approximately $1.3 million and $1.5 million for <br />the 10-year and 25-year design options respectively. These costs are based on surface <br />detention. Both detention sites are comparatively small which could require underground <br />detention to some extent, which would greatly increase construction cost and create <br />maintenance concerns. <br /> <br />Alternative 4 is similar to Alternative 3 but conveys stormwater runoff to a single <br />detention facility at the Middle School site. Total estimated costs for this alternative are <br />approximately $1.5 million and $1.7 million for the 10-year and 25-year design options <br />respectively. These costs are also based on surface detention and if underground <br />detention is utilized, construction costs would increase significantly. <br /> <br />Sunset Addition <br />The Sunset Addition includes areas along Emerson Street in the western portion of the <br />City of Brush and in the vicinity of Sunset Park. Three alternatives were considered for <br />the Sunset Addition area. Alternative 1 consists of a combination of Altematives 4 and 5 <br />of the previous Carter Burgess study. Altemative 1 consists on construction of additional <br />inlets and storm sewer in Emerson Street and a larger storm sewer outfall in Cambridge <br />Street that discharges to an existing retention facility near Pettey's Gardens north of Mill <br /> <br />Nolte Associates,Inc. <br /> <br />9 <br />