My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10396
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10396
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:32 AM
Creation date
11/5/2007 3:57:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
33
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
South Boulder Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - South Boulder Creek - Volume 1
Date
12/1/1973
Designation Date
6/21/1974
Prepared For
Boulder, UDFCD
Prepared By
R.W. Beck and Associates
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />IV -I <br /> <br /> <br />SECTION IV <br /> <br />BENEFIT-COST ANALYSES <br /> <br />Two basic approaches were required for a cost benefit analysis <br />in the South Boulder Creek Basin. One approach was necessary for the <br />developed areas where physical improvements were proposed and an- <br />other approach was necessary for undeveloped areas. <br /> <br />There are many items that can be taken into consideration in the <br />calculation of benefits. These include direct and indirect benefits. <br />Direct benefits are the reduction of flood damage los ses measured by <br />cost of area restoration to preflood conditions. Also included as a benefit <br />is the increased value of lands in the flood plain which are to be pro- <br />tected from the 100-year return interval flood. Indirect benefits are <br />the reduction of economic losses due to interruption of commerce traffic, <br />communication and other activities and the cost of activity made <br />necessary by the flood such as flood fighting measures and the relief <br />of flood victims. <br /> <br />Indirect losses for localized flooding are recognized as a cost, <br />but because they are difficult to quantify in localized flooding such as <br />would occur, they are not considered in this study. <br /> <br />For the developed areas, the cost-benefit analysis used the tra- <br />ditional method involving the direct costs of the drainage improvements <br />and the required engineering and administrative costs associated with <br />their implementation. The benefit accrued is the reduction in flood <br />damages. <br /> <br />In quantifying the direct losses, it was found by the Corps of En- <br />gineers, Dr. Gilbert White and others that the flood losses are generally <br />proportional to the depth of the flood waters, as shown on Figure 12. <br />Therefore, once the value of a structure and contents is known and the <br />depth of flooding determined, the amount of damage to the structure <br />can be estimated. These damage costs can then be put on a value per acre <br />basis in order to determine losses over different portions of the flood plain. <br />This can be done by classifying the different subdivisions in terms of their <br />value and density as proposed by L. Douglas James,(2) and evaluating the <br />terms of the following equation: <br /> <br />CD = ~KD MS h A <br /> <br />(2) L. Douglas James, "Role of Economics in Flood Plain Land Use", <br />Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE Vol. 98, No. HY6, June, 1969, <br />pp. 981 - 982. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.