Laserfiche WebLink
Tools <br />odOverall <br />Ranking <br />Ranking <br />Ranking <br />Education <br />Plant Selection; Irrigation design <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />options, demonstration plantings, <br />system design workshops, PSA's <br />Conservation Rates <br />Inclining Block <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Awards/Recognition <br />Landscaping design <br />2 <br />1 <br />1.5 <br />Regulatory <br />Landscape ordinance, time <br />1 <br />2 <br />1.5 <br />restrictions, waste reduction <br />Grants <br />Grants to large users to develop <br />1 <br />3 <br />2 <br />demonstration projects and <br />landscape or irrigation system <br />changes <br />Use Audits <br />Irrigation system leak, <br />2 <br />2 <br />2 <br />maintenance issues <br />Rebates <br />Irrigation controllers, soil <br />2 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />moisture sensor purchase and <br />installation <br />Water Efficient Industrial and Commercial Processes. <br />The bulk of our commercial and industrial users actually follow a more domestic use pattern <br />rather than that of what might normally be associated with such uses because of their limited <br />numbers and small size. Such users also tend to follow a more formal decision making process <br />when considering improvements. If they see that the "payback" for improvements is positive <br />and can be attained in a reasonable amount of time, they are more likely to adopt improvements. <br />The change in our rates and rate structures discussed elsewhere in the plan will help encourage <br />improvements that will reduce their water use. One of the things we will be encouraging will be <br />water re- circulation systems for car washes. <br />Our institutional users, as mentioned earlier, have a much higher potential for water <br />conservation, if only because they use more water. More than half of that use is for irrigation for <br />most of these customers. In 1996 we conducted an audit of the City parks system and golf <br />course (Agro Engineering, September 1966). The focus was demand management rather than <br />conservation, but the findings were applicable to the conservation issues as well. Problems were <br />noted in a high variation in system pressures, poor design of the some of the systems, age related <br />maintenance, and control systems. While the maintenance and system pressures have been <br />addressed we still have many opportunities to improve our control systems, system design, and <br />landscaping, which was not addressed in the report. We are also looking at sub - surface irrigation <br />systems for those parks that need to have their current system replaced and for new installations. <br />In our limited contact with current users of sub - surface systems, they have indicated a savings <br />potential of 30% or more with no decrease in performance. We will also be replacing some of <br />1960's era toilets in City Hall in the summer of 2007. This will not only help reduce our use, but <br />serve as an "exhibit" of some of the various low flow toilets available today. <br />Adam States College started looking seriously at their irrigation systems due to the anticipated <br />cost increases associated with the new arsenic treatment plant. They conducted a system <br />City of Alamosa I Water Conservation Plan I May 2007 1 Page 15 of 29 <br />