Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IV. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The floodway has been computed for the <br /> <br />tabulated <br /> <br />the analyses for other recurrence Intervals <br /> <br />100-year event <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />based on a one foot and a one-half foot rise in the energy grade line elevation <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mapping <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Apex <br /> <br />Lena Gulch <br /> <br />floodway have been delineated along Upper <br /> <br />100-year floodplain and <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />mapping <br /> <br />base <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />interval <br /> <br />contour <br /> <br />mapping with a 2-foot <br /> <br />mapping coverage extended <br /> <br />=100 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />UDFCD provided <br /> <br />floodway <br /> <br />floodplain and <br /> <br />100-year <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />imits <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />View Tributary <br /> <br />Gulch and Pleasant <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />located immediately <br /> <br />Maple Grove Reservoir, <br /> <br />20th Avenue, upstream along Lena Gulch <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />the Inlet <br /> <br />from <br /> <br />downstream of <br /> <br />levels <br /> <br />increases In water <br /> <br />regulated to prevent <br /> <br />is often <br /> <br />represent the area in which development <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mapping was also <br /> <br />4.2 miles <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />Apex Gulch and Pleasant <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />provided <br /> <br />the Federal <br /> <br />Federal and state agencies such as <br /> <br />flood <br /> <br />and increased damages during a <br /> <br />confluences with Lena Gulch <br /> <br />their <br /> <br />from <br /> <br />View Tributary <br /> <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) <br /> <br />the COlorado Water <br /> <br />Agency (FEMA) <br /> <br />Emergency Management <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mapping was performed by <br /> <br />1991 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />nc. based on aerial photography taken on Apri <br /> <br />respectively <br /> <br />miles <br /> <br />approximately 0.5 and 0.7 <br /> <br />Landmark Mapping <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />upstream <br /> <br />the local municipalities <br /> <br />(UDFCD) as well as <br /> <br />the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />floodway delineations as a <br /> <br />floodplain and <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />of Jefferson County, Lakewood and Golden use <br /> <br />to oversee <br /> <br />flooding and <br /> <br />from <br /> <br />to damage <br /> <br />to identify areas particularly prone <br /> <br />mechanism <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />the hydraulic analysis <br /> <br />use in <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />were provided <br /> <br />Approximately 200 digitized cross-sections <br /> <br />development activities in these floodplains <br /> <br />Cross-sections <br /> <br />time of the aerial photography <br /> <br />represent the basin conditions at the <br /> <br />These <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cross- <br /> <br />the selected hydraulic model <br /> <br />into <br /> <br />input <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />format suitable <br /> <br />were provided in a digital <br /> <br />Hvdrology <br /> <br />the cross <br /> <br />View Tributary and 2 <br /> <br />third decimal place in <br /> <br />representing Pleasant <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />to drainageway stationing <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />tributary sections with <br /> <br />section numbering corresponds <br /> <br />ndicates <br /> <br />section number <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />representing Apex Gulch <br /> <br />which has been <br /> <br />the hydrology <br /> <br />floodway delineation is <br /> <br />floodplain and <br /> <br />this <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />The basis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />basin <br /> <br />fu <br /> <br />delineation assumes <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />report <br /> <br />this <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />section <br /> <br />summarized in an earlier <br /> <br />the affected communities <br /> <br />based on land use and zoning projections provided by <br /> <br />development, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />the modeling of <br /> <br />in <br /> <br />to assist <br /> <br />were also provided by UDFCD <br /> <br />Supplemental structure surveys <br /> <br />and existing channel conditions <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Elevations <br /> <br />features were identified and provided <br /> <br />field surveys were conducted during May of 1991 <br /> <br />physical <br /> <br />structure openings and other <br /> <br />These <br /> <br />drainageway crossings <br /> <br />measurements of <br /> <br />use In the analyses <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />which were <br /> <br />results of <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />discharge <br /> <br />100-year <br /> <br />A hydraulic analysis has been performed for the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />10-year, <br /> <br />Analyses were also performed for the <br /> <br />100-year floodplain and profile <br /> <br />used to plot the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />results of <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />O-year flood profile has been plotted and <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />50-year and 500-year discharges <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />