Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19 <br /> <br />giving them <br /> <br />on the need for the <br />the need for wise use <br /> <br />floodplain ordinances <br /> <br />Krimm <br /> <br />communities do not have to enforce <br />freedom over land-use decisions. <br />In 1973, when Gilbert White testified before Congress <br />Flood Disaster Protection Act, he summed up very well <br />of the floodplain when he said: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Continued land-use management that takes account of what so far seems to <br />have been reasonable levels from experience on inland floods, is not to bring <br />economic disaster to the communities affected. It is rather to avert disaster of <br />a far greater sort to the nation as a whole. <br />To the extent that communities have not engaged in land use, one must <br />recognize that there has been a trade-off, and continues to be a trade-off, <br />between the short-term benefits that are gained by a private developer and <br />landowner and the long-term costs of the federal government in bailing out <br />those people who subsequently occupy the property and then come to the <br />federal government for relief, or for costly protection work. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />When I think that Gilbert White made that statement over 23 years ago <br />I find it discouraging that we are still fighting many of the same battles over <br />land-use that we fought over two decades ago. <br />It all may sound a bit depressing, but all hope is not lost, nor is mitigation <br />destined to fade into the backdrop. Despite all the difficulties we now face in <br />implementing mitigation, the fight is not over, and progress is still being <br />made. States like Florida are making great strides in mitigation. Both the <br />National Emergency Management Association and the Association of State <br />Floodplain Managers are actively exploring how to further incorporate <br />mitigation into their day-to-day activities and their professions. Mitigation <br />success stories are increasing in number. And the actions we have been <br />taking to protect critical facilities, buyout properties in the floodplain, elevate <br />people's homes, and guide development decisions are beginning to payoff. <br />But most importantly, I also see a political window of opportunity opening <br />for mitigation. For the first time, we have a FEMA director with credibility <br />in the emergency management community, who touts mitigation at every <br />opportunity. We have a president who is fully supportive of our efforts to <br />further the cause of mitigation and has said publicly, "the time has come to <br />mount a nationwide effort focused on reducing the impact of disasters as well <br />as reducing their economic consequences. As we continue to reach a balanced <br />budget, reduce the deficit, and protect the vital interests of our citizens. the <br />value of mitigation programs is clear." <br />We also have the disasters <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />they fac.... <br />look <br /> <br />of the last <br />of the hazards <br />actions and <br /> <br />many people's awareness <br />officials to rethink their <br />