My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10353
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10353
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:12 AM
Creation date
10/24/2007 10:03:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Fort Collins
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Twenty Years Later, What We Have Learned Since the Big Thompson Flood - Proceedings of a Meeting Held in Fort Collins - July 13-15, 1996
Date
7/13/1996
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />17 <br /> <br />of mitigation measures. This information is critical to any effort to market <br />mitigation to people and their elected officials. It would also provide the <br />federal, state, and local governments with the ammunition they need to <br />convince people that a little mitigation before a disaster is much more cost <br />effective than cleaning up the mess after a disaster occurs <br /> <br />Krimm <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Limited Resources <br /> <br />Now to the second constraint to implementing hazard mitigation: an <br />extremely limited pool of resources. Ever-shrinking budgets and competing <br />priorities describe the rules of the game we now play at FEMA, and the <br />situation isn't much better at state and local levels. We have entered an era <br />of diminishing government, and the cause of mitigation hasn't been spared <br />the cut of the budget ax. <br />The pie is getting smaller, and FEMA' s ability to fund experimentation <br />and basic research into mitigation is diminishing. As a result, it is more <br />important than ever that we end up with tangible benefits after spending the <br />dollars <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />[ <br /> <br />we still have. <br />This type of budgetary environment requires us to rethink what we are <br />doing with our limited resources to ensure we are getting our dollar's worth. <br />As a result, we need to focus on achieving practical results with our research <br />dollars. Instead of concentrating on basic research, the time has come to take <br />all the technical data and research already out there and turn it into something <br />useful for engineers, city planners, construction companies, and public <br />officials. The research community needs to focus its efforts on how to reduce <br />the costs of disasters and provide data that can be used to fight special interest <br />groups who prefer to ignore mitigation. Although the scientific community <br />must change its focus, it is the only way we can produce the results necessary <br />to maintain mitigation funding in the future <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Costs and Benefits <br /> <br />macro- <br />b.....efits of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.