Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Alison: suggested the recommendations from the National Conference on Floods Proofmg [or at <br />least what is available at the time of writing the HAP report] could be included as a <br />chapter/appendix to the HAP report/recommendations? Gilbert said he would get this to the <br />panel as soon as it is available. <br /> <br />Kevin: agreed this is a good idea; also pointed out that the new Boulder County Flood Protection <br />Handbook has a lot of good information. Alan concurred. <br /> <br />Molly: asked if other panelists have any ideas for an outline of components to be included in the <br />scoping document and that might help panel members organize what, categorically, we are trying <br />to build with the report (?). She asked if people could think about using the PowerPoint headings <br />to help build categories for a scoping document? Would like to address this at next meeting. <br /> <br />Alan asked Lynn to share his [MMS] PowerPoint presentation in the future. <br /> <br />Other Misc./Wrap-up comments: <br /> <br />Need to start collecting info-- <br />Who will pay for this? <br />Perhaps we do it in stages? <br /> <br />Who will calibrate and verify the model? <br />Developing and maintaining model like this will require continuous support . <br /> <br />People can/will spend money if they know they are at risk. <br /> <br />Floodplain management/mitigation = local program and depends on what you want to do. <br /> <br />This study could be used to revise the FEMA map- <br />Use this info to help push changes to their processes- <br />This is not just a Boulder fight... are we taking it on for the whole nation? <br /> <br />The result needs to be real thing. <br />Flood insurance controlled by Fed regs. <br />FEMA minimum standard is what must comply with - and be responsible for (?). <br />Must meet FEMA minimums to insure -- But city can also do more - above the standards. <br />Boulder community wants better standards <br />Have not heard anything yet (here) that would cost us fed support <br /> <br />Model would allow us to continuously update the stats - risks - map, anytime and able to map future conditions. <br /> <br />DEM mapping capability: Bldr Cty GIS available, USGS higher level. Seeking highest resolution mapping. <br />LIDAR good but $$$$. IFSAR: got the "O.K" if can justify (in part) as a USGS related project or study. <br /> <br />Need PI component to build credibility and buy-in with and from the public <br /> <br />Gind <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />