Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:SENT BY: BOR-WCAOS SO <br /> <br />2-17-99 12:58; <br /> <br />970 385 6539 -> <br /> <br />303 866 4474; <br /> <br />#7/12 <br /> <br />C. PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD STUDY AND ROUTING <br /> <br />A study approved Februa~ 8, 1985, identified three probable maximum flood (PKF) <br />scenarios. These scenarios are: <br /> <br />1. June rain-on-snowmelt with a peak inflow of 76,000 cf. and a lS.d&y <br />volume of 305,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />2. Local thunderstona with a peak inflow of 71,600 cfa and a 2-day volume of <br />38,400 acre. feet. <br /> <br />3. Fall general storm With a peak inflow of 94,700 cfs and a 5-day volume of <br />186,000 acre.f.et. <br /> <br />lbe most critical flood is the fall ieneral acorm PMF. Routing of this flood, <br />assuming the dam did not fail, resulted in the dam being overtopped for 7.5 hours <br />with a maximum depth of 1.4 feet. A maximum discharge of 79,200 cf. occurred <br />through the outlet structures and over the dam. An overtopping depth of 0.2 foot <br />and a total maximum discharge of 59,900 cfs occurred for the flood equal to 90 <br />percent of this PKF. Overtopping for this flood occurred for 2.6 hours. Results of <br />the routing of a flood equal to 70 percent of this PKF were a freeboard of 2.8 feet <br />and a maximum spillway discharge of 46,700 cfs. The 1IIaXimUII outlet works discharge, <br />which is between 2,950 and 3,050 cf. for .11 of the routed floods, was 3,000 cfs for <br />this flood. A flood equal to 50 percent of the fall general seom PKF vas routed to <br />de~ermine ~he minimum percentage flood that would produce flows through the spillway <br />which could cause detrimental erosion to ~he downstream slope of the dam. The <br />maximum spillway discharge for thb flood vas 37.400 cfs. Spillway cU.scharges above <br />aboue 40,000 cf. would overtop ehe lefe sp1.11way chute vall upstream of the juncdon <br />with the outlet works. This overtopping flow w111 cause erosion of the backfill <br />adjacent to the spillway chute wall and dbe earch materlal adjacenc to and <br />underneath the outlet works chute and stilling basin. Ie would also travel along <br />the outlet works to the dam slope. Uncle mining of the outlet works chute could <br />cause a differential settlement of the chute. which could cause backwater that would <br />come in contact: with the dam slope. Erosion of the downstream dam 8lop~, which <br />occur from either or both of these actions, would be detrimental to the safety of <br />the dam. <br /> <br />The other two PKF's also produce spillway discharges that would overtop the left <br />sp111way chute wall upstre811 of the outlet works junction. A freeboard of only 2.5 <br />feet occurs during routing of the June rain-on-snow PKF. Routing of the local <br />thunderstorm PKF produces a freeboard of 5.4 feet. <br /> <br />The inundation maps prepared for areas downstream of Valleclto Dam were developed <br />using the fall general storm PKF. The reservoir elevation was assumed to be 7665 <br />when the stona began. The high-pressure gate outlet works and spillway were used to <br />help pass the flood. Using these assumption., th. probable maximum flood would <br />overtop the dam. Therefore the inundat:ion maps prepared. using the probable lIlax1mum <br />flood assumed the dam would fail. The inundation map. are in the Emergency Action <br />Plan section of thi.. SOP. The following table glves informat:lon on the resulting <br />flood at key locacions aloni the rtne River. <br /> <br />111-3 <br /> <br />Revised 03/94 <br /> <br />