Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />October 29,2001 <br /> <br />Memorandum for File <br />Subject: Meeting at Greeley, Colorado, October 25,2001 <br /> <br />A meeting was held at 1300 on October 25, at the Greeley City Offices. Tom Gorman <br />represented the Corps of Engineers and Tom Browning attended for the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB). The meeting was organized by Steve Bagley ofthe <br />Greeley Public Works Department, several others from the department also attended. <br />John Liou ofFEMA Region VIII was invited, but had other commitments. <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the flood plain delineation study for the Cache <br />La Poudre River through the city of Greeley being conducted by the Omaha District for <br />the CWCB as part of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Cooperating <br />Technical Partners (CTP) program. <br /> <br />The purpose ofthe CTP study is to convert the results of a 1998 Corps Flood Plain <br />Management Services (FPMS) program study of the Cache La Poudre River in Greeley <br />in Weld County into FEMA format and to make some changes requested by the City. <br />The 1998 Corps study used cross sections from a 1997 hydraulic model for the river <br />through Greeley developed for the City by their consultant as well as new cross sections <br />obtained upstream and downstream from Greeley at locations designated by the Corps. <br />The FPMS study was funded by the Corps with the surveys provided by the City with <br />funding assistance from the CWCB and Weld County. <br /> <br />In the FPMS study, adjustments were made mainly to the encroachment parameters in the <br />consultant's 1997 hydraulic model. It was assumed that the cross section and bridge <br />geometry in the consultant's hydraulic model was adequate. The floodway delineated by <br />the consultant was not satisfactory, so the FPMS study revised the floodway delineation <br />through Greeley as well as downstream and upstream of the city. <br /> <br />For the CTP study, the City obtained some channel survey information at the 8th Street <br />Bridge. The City was concerned about an abrupt three foot jump shown in the channel <br />bed immediately upstream of the bridge. The City's surveys did not find such an abrupt <br />change in the bed elevations. The City also surveyed top of bank elevations along the <br />river between 8th Street and 5th Street. At several cross sections in this reach, the top of <br />bank elevations used in the hydraulic model were several feet off from the surveyed <br />elevations. A possible reason for this was that spoil bank levees along the banks in this <br />reach were damaged and rebuilt after a flood in 1993 and the data in the hydraulic models <br />was from 1987 aerial photos. The City was also concerned that several bridges in the <br />study reach have been replaced since 1987 and it is not certain that the new bridges were <br />included in the consultant's hydraulic model. The result of all this is that the City now <br />has a low level of confidence in the cross section and bridge data provided to the Corps <br />for the reach between Ash Avenue and 25th Avenue. <br />