My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes Sep 2007 CBRT
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Minutes Sep 2007 CBRT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:57:58 PM
Creation date
10/22/2007 12:47:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Title
September Meeting Minutes
Date
9/24/2007
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Timeline for Phase I and II <br />Sep -Nov 2007 March 2008 Oct -Nov 2008 Jan 2009 March 2009 July 2010 <br />Determine Select Phase I Deternne Phase Select Phase II Complete Complete <br />Phase I scope contractor and II scope of work contractor and Phase I Phase II <br />of work begin Phase I begin Phase II <br />Budget Phase I Phase II Phase III <br />Expected cost $1,000,000 $1 to 2,000,000 - <br />Amount appropriated 500,000 - - <br />Under funding 500,000 1 to 2,000,000 - <br />Participant comments are described below. <br />Goals are transparency and confidence in the results. Eric Kuhn: The Water Availability <br />Study won't give us an answer of absolute acre feet available for development, instead we <br />will receive a range of additional water available. If the range is too conservative, Colorado <br />will not develop the frill amount of water available under the state Compacts. If the range is <br />too aggressive, some users will bear all of the risk of curtailment in dry years. All water <br />rights that are junior to the 1922 Colorado River Compact are at risk. The Water Availability <br />Study should accomplish two goals: <br />i. Transparency so users lalow how results were determined. <br />ii. Confidence in the study so that difficult decisions can be made based on the study. <br />b. The Water Availability Study must be done. Jolu1 Porter, Southwest Roundtable. Colorado <br />does not have a choice, as this study must be done. We believe in data and, if properly <br />compiled, users will abide by decisions based on the data. <br />The Water Availability Study should stick to the timetable. Bill Trampe, Gunnson <br />Roundtable: This study should benefit the state as a whole, not just the eastern or western <br />slopes. The Water Availability Study should be done as soon as possible, and the above <br />timetable should be met. <br />d. Gunnison's recreation industry relies on continued flows. Marc Catlin, Gunnison <br />Roundtable: Recreational fishing and hydropower needs must be considered as well. <br />Gunnison has a major recreation industry. SWSI has had problems in Gunnison, and we'd <br />like to rectify this in the Water Availability Study. For instance the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison wasn't adequately represented. <br />e. The Water Availability Studv will help prevent agricultural drvuas now occurring on the East <br />Slope. Carlyle Currier. The eastern slope is facing big problems because they overdeveloped <br />water. Farmland is being dried up because a Water Availability Study wasn't done when <br />land was developed. The East Slope thinks the solution is to take more water from the West <br />Slope -they thii~lc there's still a lot of water available over here. <br />I: AInterbasnl Compact Committee~Basin Roundtables\Colorado~IVlimrtes~2007~Minutes Sep 2007 CBRT.doc 3 10~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.