Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-..I <br /> <br />This stocking plan requires the propagation of fish over seven years for bonytail, eight <br />years for razorback sucker and nine years for Colorado pikeminnow. These time frames allow for <br />the recruitment and full maturation of the desired three adult age groups, and permit assessment <br />of their reproductive success and juvenile fish survival for three years. For razorback sucker, <br />stocking is proposed for two reaches of the Colorado River from Rifle to Debeque and Palisade <br />to Stateline, and in the Gunnison River from Hartland Dam to Redlands Dam. Within Czapla <br />(1999) and Wydoski (1995), these three reaches are all included within the range of one genetic <br />population of razorback sucker for the Upper Colorado River subbasin. For Colorado <br />pikeminnow, stocking is proposed in two rivers-the Colorado River from Rifle to Debeque and <br />the Gunnison River from Hartland Dam to Redlands Dam. The Colorado and Gunnison river <br />reaches are included together as part of the range for one genetic population of Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the Upper Colorado River subbasin (Wydoski 1995, Czapla 1999). Bonytail is <br />proposed for stocking in the Yampa River in Dinosaur National Monument and in the Colorado <br />River within the Grand Valley reach. Due to this species extirpation in the wild, the Recovery <br />Program Genetics Management Plan identifies only one captive genetic stock, from which all <br />restored populations must be derived. <br /> <br />For all three of these species, the size of fish to be stocked represents the estimated size <br />of fish after the second growing season for razorback sucker and bonytail, and the third growing <br />season for Colorado pikeminnow. This approach is consistent with recommendations made by <br />Burdick and Bonar (1997) for stocking razorback sucker. For all three species, the size at <br />stocking also represents the sizes at which the fish may be PIT tagged prior to stocking. It is <br />recommended that PIT tagging be used on all fish stocked. The cost for PIT tags will range from <br />$5,000 to $45,000 per stocked population per year based on 1,340-12,000 fish and $3.75/tag. <br />The cost of PIT tags alone will be $161,700/year if all plants of all three species are made <br />annually. Monitoring would require the implementation of population estimate protocols (see <br />Osmundson and Burnham 1996) for adult fish in each river reach. <br /> <br />The target objective of stocking for each of the three species is to meet the abundance <br />criterion with the presence of at least three adult age groups surviving in each river drainage basin. <br />For razorback sucker, these age groups are 5-7; for bonytail, age groups 4-6; and for Colorado <br />pikeminnow, age groups 7-9. The cumulative survival and abundance of these age groups is <br />desired to achieve the population objective in the river. Using monitoring to evaluate survival and <br />abundance post-stocking, subsequent numbers of fish stocked may have to be increased or <br />decreased. The presence of an adult, multi-year-class population in the target river reaches is <br />desired to further determine spawning and reproductive success, and the effects of limiting <br />environmental factors that may be influential. The persistence of a potentially long-lived, stocked <br />adult population would thus contribute to recovery of subsequent self-sustaining wild populations <br />of these species in these river reaches. <br /> <br />Stocking of humpback chub in Colorado is not anticipated at this time but may become <br />necessary to augment existing small populations. This species is characteristically associated with <br />canyon-bound river habitat, which dictates where stocking would occur. Within the two canyon <br /> <br />5 <br />