Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br /> <br />r <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />'" <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />under the present circumstances of low to non-existent population numbers. Attempted spawning <br />and the production of viable eggs and larvae by these stocked populations will constitute the fIrst <br />step in conversion to desired natural function and self-sustaining status for these stocked <br />populations. <br /> <br />For razorback sucker and bonytail, no other recovery action provides an effective and <br />timely means of rel:toring wild populations in those river reaches designated within the Genetics <br />Management Plan. Success in achieving these stocking objectives could result in the establishment <br />of 1-2 bonytaiI populations where there are presently none; and 1-3 razorback sucker populations <br />in the Colorado River to complement the existing two in the middle and lower reaches of the <br />Green River. For Colorado pikeminnow, success would result in expansion of the Colorado River <br />population with potentially new tlistinct spawning aggregations in Debeque Canyon of the <br />Colorado River and in Dominguez Canyon in the Gunnison River. Construction of fIsh passage <br />structures on the Colorado River to achieve connection and tlispersal similar to that observed at <br />Redlands on the Gunnison River remains a critical component of recovery actions necessary to <br />complement restoration stocking. <br /> <br />Stocking Plan SunllDary <br /> <br />The stocking plan is presented for each species by river reach, and by fIsh size and season <br />in which stocking will occur over a seven to nine-year period. Numbers of fIsh required via <br />propagation for stocking are presented in Table 1 for each species and river reach described by <br />fIsh size, season, number of fIsh stocked annually and number of years stocked. It is proposed <br />that restoration stocking is desirable for three of the endangered Colorado River fIshes (listed in <br />priority): razorback sucker, bonytail, and Colorado pikeminnow. Table 2 provides the <br />survivorship curves used to back-calculate from the target numbers proposed as an objective for <br />each species to detemtine numbers of fIsh needed at each age/size. These survival rates and fish <br />sizes were estimated in Ryden (1997) and Wydoski (1996) for a hatchery environment, and further <br />modified and adapted by the Upper Colorado River Recovery Biology Committee on 09/26/2001 <br />for use in stocking plans for Colorado and Utah. The Committee recognizes these survival rates <br />may underestimate mtural survival and, therefore, the numbers of fIsh needed to meet stocking <br />objective endpoints in a wild setting. Due to the uncertainty in survival, a buffer equal to the <br />presumed annual adult mortality in the wild was added to the draft recovery goal abundance <br />criterion for each species to detennine the target stocking number objectives. The goal of stocking <br />for each species is the establishment of a multiple-age group population of a desired abundance <br />level in each location. Stocking would be conducted over the seven to nine-year period as shown <br />in order to meet these criteria, but would be modified by numbers stocked, size, season, or <br />location based on monitoring results. An evaluation of the monitoring data following the <br />completion of the stocking should be accomplished to integrate the annual results. These stocking <br />objectives may also b~ modified in the future based on any revisions made to the draft recovery <br />goal abundance criteria during the fmal review process currently underway. <br />