My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12497
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:18:35 PM
Creation date
10/21/2007 8:27:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River Water Projects - Glen Canyon Dam-Lake Powell - Adaptive Management
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/27/1995
Author
USBR - Lower Colorado Region
Title
Recommended Reservoir Management Criteria - Lower CO River-Lower Division States - Excerpted from CRSSez - Annual CRSS Model - Overview-Users Manual - Update of 04-01-96 - 09-27-95
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOU3'79 <br /> <br />criteria for Colorado River Reservoirs are reevaluated every 5 years <br />with better evaluation techniques and changing hydrologic, demand, <br />institutional and political conditions, making today's conclusions <br />subject to change. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />Reclamation anticipates that a shortage determination would have the <br />following effects on water availability: <br /> <br />California would receive 4.4 million acre-feet; <br /> <br />CAP and other Arizona' 4th priority users would be limited to a <br />total of one million acre-feet; <br /> <br />Nevada would bear shortage equaling 4% of u.s. shortages; <br /> <br />Mexico would bear shortage in proportion to u.s. shortages. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation also recommends that the distribution of surplus and <br />unused apportionment follow the proposal presented in the TC's <br />Progress Report NO.4, dated June 1, 1995. Surplus volumes should be <br />limited to the amount needed to satisfy total Lower Division (u.s.) <br />demand, unless the surplus is determined on the basis of avoiding <br />flood control releases. Surpluses are allocated based on the formula <br />provided in Arizona v California: (CA-50% / AZ-46% / NV-4%). If a <br />state cannot use its surplus apportionment then it should be <br />allocated as an unused apportionment. <br /> <br />In distributing unused apportionment, if only one state needs it, <br />that state's needs would be met up to the amount of the unused <br />apportionment. If two states have needs, the unused apportionment <br />would be divided as follows: <br /> <br />If it is Arizona unused apportionment, Nevada would receive the <br />first 60,000 AF for direct use or off-stream banking, California <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.