My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10480
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD10480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:13:00 AM
Creation date
10/17/2007 2:58:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Fremont
Community
Canon City
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Canon City Flood Control and Drainage Analysis
Date
9/1/1996
Prepared For
Canon City
Prepared By
WRC Engineering, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In addition, containment of water during construction would be needed for the construction of toe protection <br />at scour depth. Historical records of minimum flows along the Arkansas River at Cafton City show a typical <br />low flow depth of about 3 feet across the entire channel width. <br /> <br />The estimates include removal of the existing levee prior to the construction of the soil cement levee, WRC <br />assumed that suitable sandy soil is available nearby for use in the preparation of coil cement (excavated <br />channel bank soil may be suitable). If suitable soil is not available, RCC could be used. Soil cement is laid <br />out in lifts which are poured in-place and compacted. Typical lift heights are 0.5 feet but can vary. The top <br />width of the highest lift should not be less than 8 feet. WRC found that 1 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) side <br />slopes would fit the base lift between the channel bank and Riverview Drive for the 11,350 cfs flood event. <br />The larger magnitude floods would require slightly steeper slopes in some areas where the distance between <br />the channel bank and the road is more constricted. <br /> <br />WRC evaluated the estimated cost of riprap lined channel/soil cement levee option for three separate flood <br />events of increasing magnitude. Exhibit C shows the extent of improvements required along the south channel <br />bank for flows of 11,350, 12,265, and 13,220 cfs. The 11,350 cfs event corresponds to the magnitude of the <br />flood event that the southern bank could sustain before the weir was constructed assuming the existing levee <br />did not fail. The two larger flows correspond to water levels 0.5 and 1.0 feet higher than the 11,350 cfs <br />flood. Table 3 shows the approximate return periods and estimated costs of improvements for the base case <br />and the three evaluated flows. <br /> <br /> <br />Flow (cfs) <br /> <br />Return Period <br />(yrs) <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />------2r--- <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />Levee Height Estimated Cost ($) <br />at Section 2.0 <br /> <br />7000 (base case) <br /> <br />N/A $ 0 <br />4.4 $ 400,000 <br />- 4.9--- - -$"- -499~00(j ------ - <br />5.4 $ 608,000 <br /> <br />~.__._._----_.. ---...--..- -~ -- <br /> <br />11350 <br /> <br />_____u -- '-12265-- -, <br /> <br />13220 <br /> <br />20,500 <br /> <br />* <br />7.4 <br /> <br />* levee height does not include 3-feet of freeboard <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.