My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SuggestionsRelatingToTheReductionOfGroundwater
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
SuggestionsRelatingToTheReductionOfGroundwater
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:42 PM
Creation date
10/8/2007 10:44:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8420.500
Description
South Platte River Basin Task Force
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
7/1/2007
Author
Chuck Howe
Title
Recommendation Submitted to SPTF
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Suggestions Relating to the Reducti on of Groundwater-Surface Water <br /> Conflicts & Related Economic Costs in the South Platte Basin. <br /> Chuck Howe, Professor Emeritus of Economics, UCB, <br /> Campus Box 468, UCB, 80309 <br /> Office: 303-492 7245, Home: 720-562-8089 <br /> I have been working on the groundwater -surface water conflicts in our South <br />Platte Basin since the 1970's and have been tangentially involved with the Idaho <br />Department of Water Resource's attempts to resolve very similar conflicts on the <br />East Snake River Aquifer. I offer just a few brief remarks that may be useful to <br />the Task Force in its deliberations. <br /> 1) Appropriations doctrine ha s long served the western United States (and <br /> Colorado in particular) very we ll by allowing water supplies to be <br /> reallocated over time to meet changing and expanding demands.. <br /> 2) Appropriations doctrine ha s been surprisingly flexible in adapting to <br /> changing demographic, ag ricultural and climatic conditions. Examples of <br /> useful modifications would include conditional water rights, arrangements <br /> for out-of-priority diversions and st orage, recognition of instream uses <br /> (including recreation) as beneficial uses, legislativ e authorization of water <br /> banks in the major basins, authorizati on of rotating fallow lease plans, etc. <br /> These modifications have taken place while enforcing the "no injury rule", <br /> thus protecting property rights. <br /> Given this histor y, any modifications made to water law, water <br /> regulations and institutions will have to take place within the broad <br /> framework of appr opriations doctrine. <br />3) The calls on the river that have resu lted in the shut-down of wells in 2006 <br /> and 2007 have resulted in large economic net losses in the following <br /> forms: <br /> a) the immediate and complete shut-down of agricultural <br /> production on the affected farms; <br /> b) large related losses of income and employment in linked service <br /> and processing industries (ref. CWRRI completion report 207); <br /> c) substantial losses to other par ties like the cities of Boulder, <br /> Highlands Ranch and a large number of agricultura l ditches, all <br /> of whom were called out and had to forego valuable water <br /> diversions and storage as a result of the calls (Ellinghouse <br /> presentation to Sout h Platte Forum, Nov. 2006). <br /> d) unquantified loss of the optimal use of the aquifer as our most <br /> efficient type of storage a nd as an efficient distribution system <br /> (Ralf Topper, USGS, "Natur e's Underground Reservoir-Aquifer <br /> Storage", Roundtab le presentation, July 2006). <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.