Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 36- <br /> <br />5 2 Rabbit Ears Creek Grand BLM Completed Initial Review of Data <br /> Water A yailability Analysis complete <br />5 2 Troublesome Creek Grand BLM Completed Initial Review of Data <br /> Water A yailability Analysis complete <br />5 2 Corral Creek (ISF Increase) Grand BLM Completed Initial Reyiew of Data & <br /> Existing ISF: 5-86CW2l4 Field Investigation <br /> Water A yailability Analysis complete <br />5 2 Beaver Creek (ISF Grand BLM Completed Initial Reyiew of Data & <br /> Increase) Existing ISF: 5- Field Investigation <br /> 86CW206 Water A yailability Analysis complete <br />5 2 Willow Creek (ISF Grand BLM Completed Initial Review of Data & <br /> Increase) Existing ISF: 5- Field IllYestigation <br /> 78W'3774 Water A yailability Analysis complete <br />6 1 Indian Creek Jackson BLM Completed analyses on statutory <br />6 1 South Fork Big Creek Jackson BLM determinations. Waiting on Jackson <br /> 1 County WCD to begin negotiations as <br /> North Fork North Platte directed bv the Board. Jackson <br />6 River Jackson BLM County indicated that they are seeking <br /> counsel. <br />6 '3 Piceance Creek Rio Blanco BLM. CDOW Completed Initial Review of Data & <br /> Field Investigation <br />6 '3 Black Sulphur Creek Rio Blanco BLM Completed Initial Reyiew of Data & <br /> Field IllYestigation <br />6 '3 East Willow Creek Rio Blanco BLM Completed Initial Reyiew of Data & <br /> Field Investigation <br />6 '3 Yellow Creek Rio Blanco BLM. CDOW Completed Initial Reyiew of Data & <br /> Field Investigation <br />6 '3 Little Cottonwood Creek MotTat CDOW Continuing wi th tield illYestigations <br /> on water availabilitv. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF RESOLVED CASES: The Board's ISF Rule 8i. states that: "In the event the <br />pretrial resolution includes terms and conditions preventing injUlY or intelference and does not <br />involve a modification, or acceptance of injury or interference with mitigation, the Board is not <br />required to review and ratify the pretrial resolution. Staff may authorize its counsel to sign any <br />court documents necessary to finalize this type of pretrial resolution without Board ratification." <br />Staff has resolved issues of potential injury in the following water court cases and authorized the <br />Attorney General's Office to enter into stipulations that protect the CWCB's water rights: <br /> <br />(1) Case No. 5-03CW297: Application of Eagle County <br /> <br />The Board ratified this statement of opposition at its March 2004 meeting. The Board's main <br />objective in filing the statement of opposition in this case was to ensure that the Applicant's <br />proposed change of water rights would not injure the Board's instream flow water rights on the <br />Eagle River. Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement to <br />ensure that the CWCB's in stream flow water rights will not be injured. <br /> <br />The Board holds the following instream flow water rights that could have been injured by this application: <br /> <br />CWCB Stream/Lake Amount (cfs) Approp. Watershed County <br />Case No. Date <br />5-80CW 134 Eagle River 85/35 3/17/80 Eagle River Eagle <br />5-80CW 126 Eagle River 110/45 3/17/80 Eagle River Eagle <br />5-80CW 124 Eagle River 130/50 3/17/80 Eagle River Eagle <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Sn-eam and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />