Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 19 - <br /> <br />. Colorado Springs' Southern Delivery System (SDS) <br />. SECWCD's Preferred Storage Options Plan (PSOP) <br />In addition, several interests, now including Sen. Ken Salazar, have proposed study of a multi- <br />purpose storage reservoir on Fountain Creek to provide both flood protection and perhaps <br />conservation of flood flows for recreation and/or agricultural uses. Also, Colorado State Parks <br />has been asked to consider a stream corridor type park along portions of the Fountain. <br /> <br />At its March meeting the Board authorized a $75,000 Water Supply Reserve Account grant to <br />the EI Paso County Water Authority to fund a facilitator for the Fountain Creek Vision Task <br />Force. In addition recent discussions with staff from the Colorado Water Quality Control <br />Division indicated that Gov. Ritter has made resolution of these Fountain Cr. issues a high <br />priority for his administration. Given the Governor's concerns, and in pmi because of our new <br />financial relationship with the Task Force staff will be elevating its involvement in Fountain <br />Creek issues and studies. We hope to bring all the resources of the Board and its programs, <br />including flood protection, compacts, instream flows, and water supply development and <br />financing to bear on crafting scientifically driven solutions to the issues on Fountain Creek. I <br />have designated Steve Miller from the Board's staff to be my lead on these efforts, and we will <br />be presenting a more detailed discussion of Fountain Creek issues, studies, and planning <br />activities during the November Board meeting. <br /> <br />~ COLORADO RIVER BASIN ~ <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER NEEDS AND AL TERNA TIVE ANALYSIS STUDY MAKES <br />SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS: In August CWCB staff met with the Interbasin Compact <br />Committee (IBCC) to refine the scope of work to further evaluate water availability in the <br />Colorado River basin and its tributaries. The meeting went very well and overall the IBCC was <br />pleased with the content of the scope of work. The primary desire of the IBCC was to try to <br />expedite the schedule and to get answers to how much water Colorado might develop under <br />different scenarios. This goal was slightly different that the initial direction that was given to <br />staff; to first only look at current demands and from the legislature which could not reach <br />agreement to include examining climate change. <br /> <br />To address this direction the scope was reorganized into two phases and the schedule shortened. <br />The two Phases generally are: "model development and initial existing demand analysis" and <br />"model implementation of future demand/supply scenarios. The key challenge for future supply <br />scenarios is to have consensus and peer reviewed method/products for: 1) climate model(s) <br />development/refinement; 2) downscaling the model(s) to Colorado and its sub-basins; and 3) <br />translation of downscaled climate model(s) to hydrology. The timing of this will depend on <br />entities outside of the study team and will affect the timeline for study implementation. <br /> <br />Staff will discuss revision 3 of the scope of work with the IBCC on September 11 and the results <br />of the meeting will be included in the directors report discussion. <br /> <br />GLEN CANYON ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: The Adaptive Management <br />Workgroup (AMWG) met in Flagstaff, Arizona on August 17-18. Brenda Burman, the newly <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Sn-eam and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />