My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
17 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:36:08 PM
Creation date
9/28/2007 10:59:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/18/2007
Description
Flood Section - State Hazard Mitigation Plan - Flood Chapter Update - FEMA Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. Gunnison County PDM Plan <br />. Hinsdale County PDM Plan <br />. Northern Colorado Regional Plan <br />. San Miguel County PDM Plan <br />. University of Colorado at Boulder <br />. Pitkin and Eagle Counties <br /> <br />. Mesa County PDM Plan <br />. Prowers County PDM Plan <br />. Rio Blanco County PDM <br />Plan <br /> <br />Efforts to prepare additional plans are on-going. These entities consist of the following: <br /> <br />. Grand County . EI Paso County <br />. Kiowa County . City of Boulder <br />. Baca County . Bent County <br />. Pueblo County . Routt County <br /> <br />Finally, funds available through the FMA program have been utilized for both planning <br />and projects for flood mitigation. These funds are currently allocated to the following <br />entities: <br /> <br />. City of Sterling project . Teller County plan <br />. Town of Gilcrest project . Ouray County plan <br />. Costilla County plan . Boulder County plan <br />. Summit County plan . Huerfano County plan <br />. Delta County plan . City of Fort Collins et al. <br />. Park County plan <br /> <br />MITIGATION ACTIONS <br /> <br />A. Identification of Actions Under State Consideration <br /> <br />While similarities exist among the concepts of hazard mitigation, strong differences also <br />exist among many of the strategies available to carry out these concepts. Warnings and <br />land use application, such as floodplain regulations and acquisition of open space, are <br />particularly cost-effective mitigation activities especially when compared to other <br />available strategies, such as relief, insurance, and project measures. Effective land use, <br />for example, can provide very high net benefits and can significantly lower future <br /> <br />48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.