My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
17 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:36:08 PM
Creation date
9/28/2007 10:59:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/18/2007
Description
Flood Section - State Hazard Mitigation Plan - Flood Chapter Update - FEMA Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />With respect to State owned or operated critical facilities located in flood hazard areas, <br />the Colorado Office of Risk Management and the Colorado DEM updated the potential <br />vulnerability and loss data presented in the 2004 update to the NHMP 2001 umbrella <br />document. State critical assets were specifically identified through the development of a <br />digital risk layer. <br /> <br />In 1994, there were 9,893 flood insurance policies. In September 2007, there were <br />17,788 flood insurance policies statewide with an insured value of $3,626,858,400. <br /> <br />B. Potential Losses Based on Estimates In Local and State Risk <br />Assessments <br /> <br />The information obtained from local emergency managers, through either the state- <br />sponsored surveyor local hazard mitigation plans, was supplemented with information in <br />the FEMA Community Information System. Communities and unincorporated areas of <br />counties participating in the NFIP reported on population and stmctures at risk. As <br />indicated in Table 4, losses associated with the flood hazard for 2006 exceeded $8.2 <br />million. The potential loss based on the local risk assessment assumed a worst-case <br />scenario, in which all stmctures covered by flood insurance incurred the maximum loss. <br />Under this assumption, the potential loss was estimated to be approximately $3.6 billion. <br /> <br />The value of state assets located in the floodplain is presented in Table 6. <br />Approximately $122 million in assets (buildings, vehicles, contents) were identified <br />as being at risk. Assuming a worst-case scenario, in which all assets were assumed to <br />be at risk during a 100-year flood event, the total potential loss to assets becomes <br />$122 million. In addition, the potential losses associated with bridges that were <br />determined to be at risk from scour during flooding events were estimated. <br />Statewide, 358 bridges were determined to be scour critical with a total replacement <br />cost of $237 million. Table 9 presents a summary of the potential losses associated <br />with state critical assets at risk from a 1 OO-year flooding event. <br /> <br />C. Impacts on Losses from Changes in Development <br /> <br />Information reflecting changes in development for jurisdictions in flood hazard prone <br />areas was provided in previous sections to this report. There is a close correlation <br /> <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.