My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00146 (2)
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00146 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:18:01 AM
Creation date
9/19/2007 4:06:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Western States Water Council - San Antonio, TX., October 18-21, 2005
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - San Antonio, TX., October 18-21, 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Full Council Minutes <br /> <br />Seattle, Washington <br />July 15, 2005 <br /> <br />Susan asked about Washington's Task Force on Reserved Water Rights. <br /> <br />Mr. Manning stated that water rights settlements and validation of senior rights are an agency <br />priority. There is a proposal to create a water court. Yesterday, the Lummi and Nooksack Nations <br />were at the task force meeting, some other tribes think they are better off with an unquantified right. <br />Others see water being "spoken for." Also, in Washington you don't need a permit for "exempt <br />wells." However, these wells have an effect on instreamflows and Indian water rights. <br /> <br />Jack Stults asked about who is at the table with watershed groups. <br /> <br />Mr. Manning said they include governmental entities with obligations under any approved plan <br />has to be at the table. DOE provides assistance and oversight. However, the tribes sometimes have <br />disapproved watershed group plans. Ken Slattery explained the state has provided $9-$11 million to <br />help watershed groups. <br /> <br />Jim Davenport asked about the drought emergency. <br /> <br />The Governor's March 10 declaration makes $2 million available, and the Legislature has <br />appropriated $8 million. This money will mostly be used to lease water for this year so that it can be <br />left instream for fish and wildlife or to go to preserve perennial crops. Hay farmers are letting water <br />go to orchards and vineyards. This money also covers administrative costs. There are also some direct <br />projects, such as moving stranded fish. The declaration also requires that DOE must process in 15 <br />days emergency well applications and we have added staff to get the job done. We have approved 90 <br />wells that can only be used under a drought declaration. The Yakima Basin is the driest this year. <br />DOE has issued a request for proposals to acquire water. You propose a price. DOE has secured <br />water for 200 domestic users that would not have had any water at all. Money and administration <br />processes have been expedited. The 2001 drought prepared us. "We were ready to go." <br /> <br />Karl Dreher asked, "How much did you pay? <br /> <br />Ken: "I don't know, but the Yakima Basin has a 7-year water market record. They know." <br /> <br />Mr. Manning said that DOE is trying not to "jack up" the market. <br /> <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES <br /> <br />John Keys, Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, spoke from prepared remarks <br />(attached). He addressed the question: "What does it take to keep water running in the future?" He <br />then referred to a Tuesday hearing before the House Resources Committee's Water and Power <br />Subcommittee (at which WSWC Deputy Director Tony Willardson was scheduled to testify) as the time <br />to let people know your problems. He talked about the proposed Black Rock Dam in the Yakima Basin <br />as a potential demonstration project for major interagency construction. "What will the dam of the <br />future look like?" Physically, it will look the same, but there will be numerous owners and financing <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.