Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Full Council Minutes <br /> <br />Seattle, Washington <br />July 15, 2005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />There is intense competition for new water in the Columbia Basin. We've had to ask, "Can we <br />issue new rights?" "Is it completely appropriated?" After 20 years of discussion, we asked the <br />National Academy of Science (NAS) to study these questions, but we got ambivalent answers. <br />However, the study found that more July and August diversions would harm species listed under the <br />federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Under our Governor's Columbia River Initiative, we have <br />searched for solutions. One alternative is to pay Canada to release water in the summer from storage <br />in the Upper Basin, which could then be divided between fish and off- stream use. "Is it good for <br />everybody? Everybody hates it." <br /> <br />The Columbia River System is an international watershed. The NASobserved that the states <br />and provinces need to get together. Washington has a 1970 legislative policy to maintain base flow for <br />instream use - fish, navigation, water quality - which is treated just like any other water right. But is <br />a relatively junior water right that doesn't affect more senior water rights. We are now trying to meet <br />those target flows. We've asked watershed groups to help us review those flows and how best to meet <br />our targets. We also have to address water needs for CW A total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), <br />ESA, and irrigation demands. <br /> <br />We have had some success in some watershed groups. To be successful, you need everyone to <br />stay at the table, especially tribes. The watershed groups "can do this, but not with DOE approving . <br />each and every decision." DOE looking for ways to give groups the flexibility they need to implement <br />agreements, which include voluntary shortage sharing, contrary to the principles of the Appropriation <br />Doctrine. We have .set 16 new instreamflows. We have to take "bad paper" out of the system [water <br />rights that are not valid] and we need data on water use. <br /> <br />Water storage is a priority for the state, and Governor Gregoire is tired of planning for storage. <br />She's said, "I want to build some." One proposed multiple purpose reservoir is the $4 billion Yakima <br />Black Rock Project. It is controversial, but it also has a lot of support. There are other smaller <br />possibilities, including alternatives to main channel, fish blocking dams. <br /> <br />Lastly, we need money, and to get it we'll have to take it to the people. To fund multipurpose <br />storage projects, we'll need a bond issue for identifiable purposes. "We can't do it without more <br />resources. " <br /> <br />Questions & Answers <br /> <br />Craig Bell asked about what seems to be the difference between watershed group success <br />stories and failure. <br /> <br />Mr, Manning observed it is sometimes a mystery, but personalities have a lot to do with it. <br />Also, watershed groups have succeeded where tribes stayed at the table. In other cases the tribes have <br />walked, with their reserved rights, saying we're not going to play. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />