My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00144 (2)
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00144 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:17:10 AM
Creation date
9/19/2007 3:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
Western States Water Council - Breckenridge, CO., July 19-21, 2006
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Breckenridge, CO., July 19-21, 2006
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
491
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Quality Committee <br /> <br />Washington, DC <br />March 28, 2006 <br /> <br />The Association will be spending a lot of time on the Farm Bill. The first debate I ever <br />watched was between Mr. Muskie and Senator Domenici, and it was on navigable waterways. <br />Here we are once again. ASIWPCA submitted an amicus brief on navigable waterways and <br />jurisdiction. If we win some of the points they may be fairly narrow. This decision may come <br />out in Mayor June. The briefs are available on the ASIWPCA web site. <br /> <br />I'm leaving in April. My intention is to pursue rural water monitoring day. This is for <br />little kids. <br /> <br />Duane Smith: Passed on congratulations for Robbi's career at ASIWPCA. <br /> <br />Robbi Savage: Thank you. Jon Craig and Mark Coleman have always been there. As <br />Ken mentioned, we are not making progress. The appropriation bill increased funding and it said <br />a national assessment needs to be done. EP A thinks they need to do the assessment themselves. <br />That is where the problem comes. The precedent of the federal government taking 106 dollars is <br />not the way it was written, and it is not the way it should be used. <br /> <br />Art Baggett: You are absolutely right. <br /> <br />Stephen Bernath: We were told to have a statewide monitoring program and dictated what <br />had to be in it. We need better monitoring to make better decisions for TMDLs or whatever. We <br />don't need to help the nation understand what is going on. <br /> <br />Robbi Savage: Concerns about the Office of Water keeping all of the data. You could do <br />away with the 305 program. <br /> <br />I think you have a tough road ahead. I thank Paul and Shaun for getting both <br />organizations together. <br /> <br />My deputy Linda Eichmiller will be in the Acting Executive Director role. <br /> <br />Paul - thanked Robbi. <br /> <br />Sunsetting Resolutions: <br /> <br />Resolution on protecting Ground Water Quality. <br /> <br />Paul Frohardt does not believe this is an active area of focus. This position statement <br />seems to still be valid. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.