My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150057 Approval Letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C150057 Approval Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:25:13 AM
Creation date
9/14/2007 2:35:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150057
Contractor Name
West Rhone Lateral Ditch Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
72
County
Mesa
Bill Number
SPL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />West Rhone Lateral Ditch Co. <br />November 20.21, 2000 <br /> <br />enda Item 15b. <br />dated November 22, 2000) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />shareholders that fail to pay their assessments, and the power to file a lien on property of <br />delinquent shareholders. <br /> <br />Water Riahts <br />The source of water for the WRLDC is 130 shares of Grand Valley Irrigalion Company waler <br />from the Mainline Canal. This amounts to 1.3 CFS (one share is 4.675 gallons per minute), and <br />averages 541 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />Proiect Description <br />Six alternatives were analyzed in the feasibility study. Four key alternatives are listed here: <br /> <br />1. The no-action alternative. <br />2. Replace the concrete ditch with underground pipe all the way to the divide box. <br />5. Replace 0.25 miles of concrete ditch with underground pipeline and tie in to Lateral 405. <br />6. Construct a new headgate on the GVIC Mainline and a new 1-mile pipeline, and replace <br />0.25 miles of concrete ditch with a new pipeline. <br /> <br />Alternalive 2, Replace the concrete ditch with underground pipe all the way to the divide box, <br />was ruled out because it does not solve the problem of water shortages associaled with misuse <br />of the divider box off Lateral 395. Other alternatives that involved retaining the old divider box <br />arrangement were also ruled out Alternative 5, Replace 0.25 miles of concrete ditch with <br />underground pipeline and tie in to Lateral 405, was ruled out as too expensive. The 405 Lateral <br />pipeline is already at capacity and would need to be completely replaced. For these reasons <br />Alternative 6 was selected, since it is considered 10 have the least overall cost, and to be a <br />reliable approach. The no-action alternative was considered unacceptable since it means the <br />WRLDC could not provide full water delivery to its shareholders. <br /> <br />1"Selected Alternative 6 involves construction of a new headgate with concrete inlake strucl~ <br />\ on the south side of the Mainline Canal, just easl of Road 21. 6,500 feet of 12-inch plastic \ <br />\ pipeline (80 psi rated) will be laid along 21 Road right of way. The new pipeline will tie into the \ <br />\ existing 12-inch West Rhone Lateral pipeline 1.25 mile south of the new headgate. Taps will be ~ <br />[E!pvided off the new pipeline to deliver waler to the shareholders. _- <br /> <br />The implemenlation schedule calls for completion of financing arrangemenls and final NRCS <br />engineering design in late fall 2000. Conslruction will take 30 to 90 days, and will be completed <br />in winter 2000/2001. <br /> <br />Financial Analvsis <br />The tolal estimated cost of the project is $111,518, and the water is used by the shareholders <br />for agricultural purposes. Staff is recommending a 30-year loan from lhe Small Project Account <br />in maximum amount of $100,000 (approximately 90% of estimated project cost) <br /> <br />Alternative financing sources: The Company actively sought alternative financing. They were <br />able 10 obtain a grant from the NRCS to cover project planning and design. They have also <br />been approved for an NRCS grant for project construction, payable when the project is <br />complete. The WRLDC plans to apply for a $15,000 grant from the Colorado River Water <br />Conservancy Dislricl (CRWCD) in early 2001. <br /> <br />The WRLDC also requested a loan from two local banks (Alpine Bank and Home Loan Bank of <br />Grand Junction) but was turned down because neilher bank provides conslruction loans with <br />long-term fixed rate financing, Table 1 is a summary of financing for the project: <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.