My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00144
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:16:56 AM
Creation date
8/31/2007 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Western States Water Council - Boise, ID., April 20-23, 2005
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Boise, ID., April 20-23, 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Santa Ana Pueblo, New Mexico <br />October 28,2004 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />private consultants." All USGS costs are billed to the program, including travel, infrastructure, <br />administrative salary, etc. "We're paying true costs." <br /> <br />Tony Willardson mentioned it appears that only $3 million more is needed to match western <br />states contributions under the Cooperative Water Program. <br /> <br />Jack Stults raised the need for partnerships in securing additional funding and mentioned Allen <br />Powers and the Western Coalition of Conservation Districts as possible allies. He also suggested we <br />could "braid in" the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) working group, which is <br />seeking to bring together water, climate and weather informa~ion. <br /> <br />Sue Lowry stated that - along the lines of getting the facts - she was serving on another <br />Cooperative Program review task force with Barney Austin of Texas and others. The task force is <br />looking at how USGS has addressed earlier recommendations for program improvements. They will be <br />meeting next in a couple of weeks in Denver, with a report expected by the end of the year. The <br />report will include a state-by-state listing of lost gages. <br /> <br />Dave suggested that the only difference he sees now with USGS is that the National <br />Streamgaging Information Program (NSIP) is filling in some gaps left as states decline to match funding . <br />for specific gages. Sue's task force will provide more current information. <br /> <br />Allen Powers asked how they could participate as far as western issues. <br /> <br />Dave suggested that staff create a 1-2 page strategy and to do list for states, non-federal <br />partners, and others. <br /> <br />Jack added that the National Research Council is looking to do something in water. <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich asked about satellite technology work that might replace SNOTEL snow <br />measurement and monitoring sites. He also added that the USGS seems to "have the uncanny ability to <br />identify those sites [to discontinue] that are critical to us." <br /> <br />The discussion turned to water development, which it is feared will come up short of <br />anticipated demands. Interior's Water 2025 initiative was an attempt - woefully underfunded - to <br />address growing conflicts and concerns over our future water supply. New water development and <br />water reuse will be important in meeting the future demands created by growth. <br /> <br />Pat Tyrrell asked a general question on data related to water use and the movement away from <br />gravity irrigation systems to center pivots. Wyoming's experience seems to be that it is almost counter <br />productive. Rather than using less water, consumptive use increases. He'd like to have some more <br />information. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.