Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Santa Ana Pueblo, New Mexico <br />October 28, 2004 <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />The minutes of the meeting held on July 15,2004 in Newport, Oregon were moved, seconded and <br />unanimously approved. <br /> <br />WESTERN WATER SUPPLY CHALLENGES WORKSHOP REPOR1: <br /> <br />Dave Pope reported on the workshop on Water Supply Challenges held September 28-29, in Salt <br />Lake City entitled, "How Do Western States Plan to Meet Expected Water Shortages?" He also briefly <br />summarized the discussion between the states following the meeting with federal officials. The member <br />states participating identified three priority areas for coop~~rative action: (1) Data Collection and <br />Forecasting; (2) Water Development, Storage and Reuse; and (3) Water Conservation. A list ofthe topics <br />considered was included in the briefing books under Tab K. <br /> <br />Dave noted, with respect to water conservation, that he was surprised at the level of interest in <br />the topic and related programs, such as the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Environmental Quality <br />Improvement Program (EQIP), administered by the Natural Resources Comervation Service (NRCS). <br />He asked, "Are all these programs working in tandem as they should? For example, on-farm water <br />conservation mayor may not facilitate and may even aggravat~: aquifer depletions counter to basin-wide <br />conservation efforts." He asked further, "Do we have an appropriate definition of water <br />conservation? " <br /> <br />On data collection and management, he added that we've had some success in getting funding <br />for the NRCS snow survey and water supply forecasting program. Water quality data is another area <br />of interest, as is the U.S. Geological Survey's Cooperative Water Program. Dave reported that Bob <br />Hirsch, USGS Assistant Director and Chief Hydrologist, also addressed the streamgaging program in <br />his presentation. Related program cost increases are a problem, and some states are moving towards <br />running their own gaging programs, while others are considering such action. <br /> <br />Water development is also going to be important given our growing: cities in the West. Water <br />development, as discussed, would include new storage, as well as other supply augmentation efforts <br />such as water reuse. <br /> <br />An extended discussion followed Dave's remarks. <br /> <br />Kevin Ward exclaimed, "We need more information on USGS streamgaging costs and cost <br />increases." The group discussed federal salary increases that are not fully federally funded, raising <br />overhead costs that are passed on to the states and others under the cooperative program. There is a <br />need to work with Congress and the Appropriation Committees to end the continuing downward spiral <br />in funding and the loss of gages. <br /> <br />Dave explained that five years ago or so he had served on an external review group looking at <br />the coop program. "I came away with a surprising view that USGS costs are not out of line with <br /> <br />3 <br />