My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10427
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10427
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:40:55 PM
Creation date
8/29/2007 3:46:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Title
South Metro Water Supply Study - Technical Appendices
Date
2/1/2004
Prepared For
South Metro Water Supply Study Board
Prepared By
Black & Veatch, Rick Giardina & Associates, HRS Water Consultants, Hydrosphere
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ECCVWSD has purchased the non-tributary groundwater resources of the Willows Water District <br />contingent on the findings of Water Court. The cost of these water rights was $] 8,500,000. Both <br />water and funds are currently in escrow until the Water Court rules on the terms of the proposed <br />purchase. Approximately 5,800 acre-feet per year of adjudicated non-tributary groundwater are <br />associated with the north and south well fields in the Willows Water District. ECCVWDS is <br />constructing a 20 MGD pipeline along a ]4 mile alignment that follows E-470 at an estimated <br />cost of over $30,000,000. <br /> <br />The District recently completed a detailed assessment of wastewater reuse opportunities <br />( Wastewater Reuse Assessment, CH2M HILL, 2000). At this time, the District operates a <br />wastewater collection system but has no treatment system - all sewage is collected and is pumped <br />or flows through the City of Aurora's sewere system for treatment at the Metro Wastewater <br />Treatment Plant before discharge to the South Platte River north of the metropolitan area. No <br />return flow credits are available to ECCVWSD under this agreement. <br /> <br />The District considered a series of alternatives for capturing sewage effluent from one or more of <br />the drainage basins and treating that sewage for either indirect potable reuse or non-potable reuse <br />on outdoor areas. The indirect potable reuse options included advanced wastewater treatment to <br />produce drinking water quality and then injection into the Cherry Creek alluvium or the deep <br />aquifer system. Recovery wells would pump co-mingled groundwater for delivery to the potable <br />water distribution system. Costs of these alternatives ranged from $20,000 per acre-foot up to <br />$38,000 per acre- foot if seasonal storage at Reuter-Hess Reservoir was included. <br /> <br />The nopotable reuse alternatives considered operating an irrigation season reuse program with <br />treated effluent being used for irrigation of parks and open space areas. A dual distribution system <br />for delivery of treated effluent to individual residences was not considered. At build-out, this <br />program could develop up to 1,300 acre-feet of reuse water. Use of ACWW A's membrane plant <br />as well as a new District-owned plant were considered. A new seasonal storage reservoir of3,000 <br />acre~feet would be required to meet system demands. Present value costs of non potable reuse <br />programs ranged from $20,000 per acre-foot to $43,000 per acre-foot depending on <br />configurations, operating approaches and the yield to be developed. <br /> <br />At this time, the District is considering an alluvial recovery system on lower Piney Creek as a <br />means of reclaiming lawn irrigation return flows. Up to 990 acre-feet of alluvial groundwater <br />could be recaptured (at build-out conditions) for reuse on open space areas along the Piney Creek <br />greenway. <br /> <br />It is estimated that the District will have capital expenditures of $120 -130 million through the <br />year 20] 0 in well development costs if non-tributary groundwater resources alone are developed <br />to meet demands. <br /> <br />Figure E-2 illustrates the scheduled additions of water supply sources along with the projected <br />municipal water demand that is to be met by the District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.