My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10420
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:26 AM
Creation date
8/16/2007 10:57:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Broomfield
Weld
Community
Broomfield, Westminster and Thornton
Stream Name
Lower Big Dry Creek
Title
Lower Big Dry Creek Hydrology Study
Date
6/1/2005
Prepared For
Big Dry Creek Watershed Association
Prepared By
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />Lower Big Dry Creek Hydrologic Study <br /> <br />Weld County line (168th Avenue). The study area encompassed mne major tributaries, <br />including: Wadley South Creek, Wadley North Creek, Short Run, Elms Run, Morris Creek, <br />Shay Ditch, Mustang Run, Sack Creek, and Preble Creek. In 1989, the study area was essentially <br />undeveloped cultivated land with only three low-density residential developments. The study <br />showed that the existing culverts did not have adequate capacity to convey even the minor storm <br />runoff without road overtopping. The 100-year floodplain was identified as very wide, and <br />increased velocity due to higher future peak flows was anticipated to cause extensive channel <br />erosion. The three major problems identified were lack of channel conveyance, potential for <br />erosion and sedimentation, and road overtopping during minor floods (WWE 1989b). <br /> <br />To help solve these problems, the selected outfall systems included the use and/or expansion of <br />existing inadvertent detention areas and channelization from the upstream to the downstream <br />limit. Road crossings were recommended to be designed to convey the 100-year flow without <br />road overtopping. The open channels selected for the outfall system included engineered wetland <br />bottom, engineered wetland bottom with bench, and engineered grass-lined channels (WWE <br />1989b ). <br /> <br />This plan will be updated during 2005 and presents a significant opportunity for recognition of <br />downstream flooding and erosion problems. <br /> <br />5.3.4 Flood Hazard Area Delineations <br /> <br />Five floodplain studies have been conducted in the Big Dry Creek watershed, as summarized in <br />Table 6. Figure 7 shows the mapped floodplains in the watershed. The Greiner (1988) study <br />included the Big Dry Creek reach from the headwaters to 1-25, followed by the WWE (1989a) <br />study from 1-25 to the Weld County line. Greiner (1988) and WWE (1989a) indicated that <br />because of the historically undeveloped nature of the floodplain areas, relatively little flooding <br />history was available :at the time of the study. Two floods that were documented included the <br />May 1973 flood in the vicinity of Huron Street and the June 1984 flood along the middle branch <br />of Hy1ands Creek at Sheridan Boulevard. Damage was confined to the culvert crossings during <br />these historic events (Greiner 1988). Further downstream, flooding was noted at 160th Avenue <br />and 162nd Avenue where runoff overflows from the stream channel, purportedly due to <br /> <br />971-179.092 <br />June 2005 <br /> <br />Wright Water Engineers. Inc. <br /> <br />Page 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.