My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:36:02 PM
Creation date
8/8/2007 4:17:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/2007
Description
WSP Section - Intrastate Water Planning - Oil Shale Water Use
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />xii Oil 'Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues <br /> <br />National Security. A drop in world oil prices would reduce revenue to oil- <br />exporting countries. A 3 to 5 percent reduction in revenue would not change the <br />poli1:ical dynamic in those countries a great deal. With regard to enhancing national <br />security, the principal value of oil shale production would be its contribution to a <br />portfolio of measures intended to increase oil supplies and reduce oil demand. <br />Other claims of the benefits of increased domestic oil production, such as a <br />reduced trade deficits and more reliable fuel supplies for national defense purposes, <br />are not well justified. <br /> <br />Critical Policy Issues for Oil Shale Development <br /> <br />The potential emergence of an oil shale industry in the western United States raises a <br />number of critical policy issues. <br />Land Use and Ecological Impacts. Of all the environmental impacts of oil shale <br />development, the most serious appears to be the extent to which land will be dis- <br />turbed. Regardless of the technical approach to oil shale development, a portion of <br />the land over the Green River Formation will need to be withdrawn from current <br />uses, and there could be permanent topographic changes and impacts on flora and <br />fauna. For surface retorting, extensive and permanent changes to surface topography <br />will result from mining and spent shale disposal. In-situ retorting appears to be much <br />less disruptive, but surface-based drilling and support operations will cause at least a <br />decade-long displacement of all other land uses and of preexisting flora and fauna at <br />each development site. <br />Air Quality. Oil shale operations will result in emissions that could impact <br />regional air quality. Studies in the 1970s and 1980s suggested that air emissions from <br />an industry producing a few hundred thousand barrels per day could probably be <br />controlled to meet then existing regulations. No studies have been reported since, <br />and no studies have considered output on the order of several million barrels per day. <br />Meanwhile, so much has changed in terms of environmental regulations, mining and <br />process technologies, and pollution control technologies that the earlier analyses are <br />no longer relevant. <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The production of petroleum products derived <br />from oil shale will entail significantly higher emissions of carbon dioxide, compared <br />with conventional crude oil production. If these emissions are to be controlled, oil <br />shale production costs will increase. <br />Water Quality. All high-grade western oil shale resources lie in the Colorado <br />River drainage basin. For mining and surface retorting, the major water quality issue <br />is the leaching of salts and toxics from spent shale. A number of approaches are avail- <br />able for preventing surface water contamination from waste piles, but it is not clear <br />whether these methods represent a permanent solution that will be effective after the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.