My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13c
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
13c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:13 PM
Creation date
8/8/2007 3:47:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />· Colorado River Conservation District External Affairs Manager Chris Treese said <br />the major issue remains assurance that future users of Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Project facilities will properly compensate the basin of origin. The Fry-Ark <br />Project is overseen by Southeastern and brings Fryingpan River water into the <br />Arkansas River basin. Those concerns were addressed through PSOP IGAs. <br /> <br />. Bureau of Reclamation Area Manager Fred Ore said his agencis concern is <br />maximizing the benefits of existing facilities, particularly Lake Pueblo. He said <br />the pending contract with Aurora is an example of how that can be done. <br /> <br />. Lower Ark Chairman John Singletary said the district has reached conceptual <br />agreement on Fountain Creek and is working toward finding consensus on the <br />Southern Delivery System. "I told them I would support SDS if they gave us the <br />same quality of water that is taken at the Pueblo Dam where Fountain Creek <br />comes into the Arkansas River/' Singletary said. The Lower Ark is pursuing its <br />own projects on Fountain Creek as well. Singletary acknowledged talks with <br />Aurora are moving slowly. He also defended the Super Ditch concept as the first <br />study of water's value in the valley from the agricultural water rights holder's <br />point of view. <br /> <br />Fountain Creek Watershed Group Update: The ACOE Watershed Study began <br />in March 2003 and is intended to be a comprehensive analysis of the Fountain Creek <br />Watershed that establishes existing conditions and identifies an array of problems and <br />opportunities in the form of a Watershed Management Plan. This Study is not intended <br />to develop or analyze alternatives for subsequent implementation (e.g., construction <br />projects). The primary goal of a Watershed Study is to develop the Study from a <br />regional perspective in which all participating governments benefit by identifying <br />projects under other authorities to address flood control; erosion, sedimentation and <br />environmental restoration problems. <br /> <br />The technical work on the Army Corps of Engineers Watershed Study has already been <br />completed. This includes the following Reports: <br />Environmental Studies: Hazardous Materials, Wetlands, Threatened and <br />Endangered Species, Fish, Water Quality, Soils, Wildlife, Migratory Corridors, <br />Planned Projects Inventory and Restoration Opportunities <br />Hydrology, Hydraulics and Geomorphology <br /> <br />All of these reports are available on the Fountain Creek Watershed website <br />(www.fountain-crk.org) under the Army Corps of Engineers link. <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.