My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13c
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
13c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:13 PM
Creation date
8/8/2007 3:47:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Reclamation-Managing for Excellence: Reclamation held the fifth in a series of <br />public meetings on Managing for Excellence in Denver on May 30-31. The focus of the <br />workshop was "rightsizing," under five conceptual organizational alternatives for the <br />assignment and more efficient management of Reclamation's workload. At present <br />technical work and expertise is spread across the area, program and regional offices, as <br />well as the Denver Technical Services Center (TSC). <br /> <br />There are four different action alternatives under consideration. Under the "enhanced <br />utilization" alternative, a Reclamation Design and Construction Coordination Team <br />(RECCT), as well as Resources Management and Development Work Group (RMWG), <br />would be created to improve resource utilization, transparency and accountability <br />without altering the current organizational structure. The resources of other regions <br />would be considered before outsourcing work through the area office. Under the <br />"corporate utilization" alternative, a corporate "coordination" group would be <br />responsible for all Reclamation's technical workflow and tracking costs, but otherwise <br />there would be no changes in organization-al structure, workplace locations or lines of <br />supervision. Best practices would be identified and shared to enhance efficiency and <br />effectiveness. All work would be performed under a "fee-for-service" model, which <br />could be similar to the present TSC model. The coordination group would also make <br />recommendations for when and where to fill vacated technical positions. <br /> <br />Under a "six centers" alternative, Reclamation's technical services would be <br />consolidated under its five regions, with the current TSC remaining unchanged. All <br />workload planning would be done collaboratively between the program office and <br />coordination group, with fee-for-service work distributed to the appropriate regional <br />service center. Most technical staff would remain in their present locations, but some <br />would report to supervisors in different offices (virtual reorganization). A team leader <br />would be identified to coordinate work within the service center, as well as coordinate <br />technical resources work with other service centers as needed and be the liaison with <br />the program office. Whereas staff now perform multiple technical and program <br />functions, "wearing multiple hats," work would be better matched with staff capability <br />and competence. Workload planning and distribution would be centralized, with <br />decentralized, regional operations. <br /> <br />Reclamation is also considering a "three centers" alternative that would further <br />consolidate and segregate technical resources, avoiding overlapping functions. A <br />virtual organization, technical staff would be located in many different geographic <br />locations, but all three centers would report to one "director," under the supervision of <br />the Deputy Commissioner for Operations. The centers would be organized by function, <br />discipline and expertise. One possible division of responsibilities would include a: (1) <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.