My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12585
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12585
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:58 PM
Creation date
8/6/2007 11:07:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.215
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations-Entities - Colorado River Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/20/2004
Author
Unknown
Title
Colorado River Drought Management and Recovery Measures Initiative - Draft - 05-20-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000870 <br /> <br />In 1993, Reclamation completed its report, "Validation of Precipitation <br />Management by Seeding Winter Orographic Clouds in the Colorado River Basin" <br />which presented a plan for a proposed 8-year Colorado River Enhanced <br />Snowpack Test (CREST) that has not been implemented. The objective ofthe <br />CREST was to obtain scientific proof that properly conducted seeding of winter <br />orographic clouds in the Colorado River Basin will beneficially and cost- <br />effectively enhance snowpack and subsequent runoff without deleterious effects <br />on the environment. Relamation suggested that April through July total runoff <br />would increase at least 10 percent in most watersheds for a 10 percent increase in <br />the mean snowpack. Runoff increases up to 20 percent may be expected from <br />some drainages. Conversely, drainages that experience high evapotranspiration <br />and other water losses may produce less than 10 percent runoff increases. CREST <br />did not proceed. There are some precipitation management programs in existence <br />today. Reclamation should make an evaluation ofthe status ofthe technology, its <br />potential for augmenting the Colorado River water supply and for mitigating <br />climate change, and recommend, in consultation with the Basin States whether <br />CREST or a similar type program should be conducted now in the Colorado River <br />Basin. <br /> <br />AUTHORITY: (identity existing or new) <br />COST: <br />FUNDING SOURCE: <br />ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: (categorical exclusionlEIS/other) <br />ENVIRONMENTAL OR ESA ISSUES: <br />NEED FOR RULES AND REGULATIONS: <br /> <br />· Review Basin wide vegetation management for water supply improvement. <br />Similar to precipitation management, the Basin States have pursued in the past <br />vegetation management as a means of augmenting the Colorado River supply. <br />The Basin States worked with the United States Forest Service to include water <br />supply enhancement in the Forest Services's comprehensive forest management <br />plans for National Forests in the Colorado River Basin. Vegetation management <br />and precipitation management if done in a coordinated manner can produce <br />greater results than if done separately. Reclamation in cooperation with the U.S. <br />Forest Service and in coordination with the National Academy of Science study <br />on wildfire management should review the potential for augmenting the Colorado <br />River water supply through vegetation management and in concert with <br />precipitation management. It was previously believed that the two in combination <br />could increase the Colorado River Basin water supply yield by 10 percent or <br />approximately 1.5 million acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.